Pennsylvania House Bill HR99

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/25
• Refer: 3/3/25

Caption

A Concurrent Resolution directing the Joint State Government Commission to establish a bipartisan task force to study any consolidated or unconsolidated State statutes in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, Judicial Code, Sentencing Code or elsewhere under which a term of imprisonment and other collateral consequences may be imposed in order to identify redundant, overlapping and inconsistent offenses, improper grading and gaps in criminal liability, out-of-date, antiquated, offensive or unenforceable language and to make recommendations to the General Assembly.

Impact

The bill emphasizes the necessity of reforming Pennsylvania's criminal statutes to ensure they reflect contemporary societal values and legal standards. With the expansion of the Crimes Code leading to over 1,500 offenses from a mere 282 at its inception in 1972, HR99 advocates for a systematic evaluation to eliminate irrational inconsistencies and make the legal language more comprehensible to the general public. This could foster improved public trust in the legal system and provide clearer guidelines for both citizens and law enforcement agencies.

Summary

House Resolution 99 (HR99) directs the Joint State Government Commission to establish a bipartisan task force aimed at reviewing and improving the Pennsylvania Crimes Code, Judicial Code, and Sentencing Code. This initiative is proposed to address various issues such as redundant and overlapping offenses, improper grading of offenses, and outdated language within the statutory frameworks. The task force will also explore gaps in criminal liability and suggest legislative changes to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of these laws.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HR99 appears generally favorable as it seeks to tackle long-standing issues within the state’s legal framework. Legislators and stakeholders involved in criminal justice reform seem supportive of the idea that a cohesive and rational legal code will benefit communities by reducing confusion and improving compliance with laws. However, potential concerns may arise regarding how effectively the task force can navigate the complexities associated with such an extensive legal overhaul.

Contention

Notable points of contention may center around the potential resistance from various stakeholders, including those who might find the existing laws adequate or those concerned about the implications of sweeping changes on ongoing legal interpretations. The task force must balance the diverse views on criminal offenses while ensuring that the necessary reforms do not hinder justice or create unforeseen complications in law enforcement practices.