Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB333

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/25
• Refer: 2/28/25

Caption

Further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.

Impact

The introduction of SB333 could lead to a transformation of how regulations are developed and reviewed in Pennsylvania. By mandating a formal review process for economically significant regulations, the bill seeks to ensure that the potential financial implications of regulatory actions are comprehensively assessed. This could theoretically enhance governmental accountability and foster a more judicious approach to regulatory policymaking. Allowing the General Assembly to play a more active role may shield the public from unforeseen economic burdens that could arise from new regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 333 proposes significant amendments to the Regulatory Review Act in Pennsylvania, primarily focused on enhancing the oversight and procedural framework for the promulgation of regulations by state agencies. The bill aims to clarify definitions, outlining what constitutes economically significant regulations and establishing more rigorous review protocols. Particularly, it stipulates that any regulation anticipated to incur costs over $1 million annually must undergo a concurrent resolution process in the General Assembly prior to implementation, thereby increasing legislative scrutiny over impactful regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards SB333 appears to be split among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill will encourage transparency and increase oversight of regulatory bodies, which may lead to better-informed decision-making and reduced regulatory overreach. Detractors, however, express concerns that the added bureaucratic layers could hinder timely regulatory responses, particularly in swiftly changing economic conditions. There is apprehension that increased legislative involvement may slow down the regulatory process and stifle necessary regulations that aim to protect the public interest.

Contention

Critics of SB333 highlight potential drawbacks, such as the risk of placing excessive hurdles for agencies that need to implement critical regulations. The balance between the need for oversight and the agility required for effective regulation is at the heart of the debate. The bill's requirement for concurrent resolutions on economically significant regulations could lead to delays and inefficiencies, impacting the effectiveness of agencies in their mission to safeguard public welfare and manage economic growth. Stakeholders from various sectors are particularly concerned about how this legislation might impact public health, safety, and environmental regulations.