In rates and distribution systems, further providing for valuation of acquired water and wastewater systems; and providing for water ratepayer bill of rights.
If enacted, SB338 would significantly impact the regulation surrounding water and wastewater systems’ acquisitions within the state. The bill seeks to protect consumer interests by mandating referendums before major acquisitions and ensuring that pertinent information regarding utility management and service delivery is disclosed to ratepayers. This could potentially lead to fewer acquisitions deemed unfavorable by the public, preserving local management of essential resources.
Senate Bill 338, introduced in Pennsylvania, aims to amend Title 66 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes regarding the valuation of acquired water and wastewater systems. A significant focus of this legislation is the establishment of a 'Water Ratepayer Bill of Rights.' This bill mandates a ratepayer referendum prior to any acquisition of water or wastewater utilities valued at $1,000,000 or more, ensuring that the community's voice is heard in decisions about their essential services. The bill also stipulates requirements for annual reports from utilities detailing their acquisitions and changes in utility management, thereby enhancing transparency and accountability.
The sentiment surrounding SB338 appears to be generally positive among consumer advocacy groups and residents who value increased transparency and community involvement in local utility management. Supporters of the bill argue it empowers ratepayers to make informed decisions regarding their utility services, enhancing their rights as customers. However, opposition may arise from utility companies who could perceive these regulations as hindering effective business operations and management responses to market conditions.
Notable points of contention involve the complexity that these new regulations may introduce into the utility acquisition process. There are concerns that the mandate for a referenda could delay necessary system upgrades or improvements, particularly when rapid decision-making is required in response to urgent infrastructure issues. Additionally, the costs associated with conducting referenda and preparing detailed annual reports may be viewed as burdensome by utility companies.