Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB345

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Refer: 6/23/25

Caption

Further providing for a fee imposed and used for demolition.

Impact

One significant impact of SB345 is the designation of collected fees to the county demolition fund, which is to be utilized exclusively for demolishing blighted properties. This provision aims to address urban decay and enhance community development across various counties. By ensuring that funds raised through these fees are funneled directly into efforts reducing blight, the bill encourages local governments to take active steps in revitalizing deteriorating neighborhoods.

Summary

Senate Bill 345 aims to amend the existing Recorder of Deeds Fee Law by increasing the maximum fee for recording deeds and mortgages from $15 to $16. This minor adjustment will allow county governing bodies to charge an annual fee that reflects inflation, calculated based on the Consumer Price Index for the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington area. The incremental fee adjustments are intended to ensure that the fee remains relevant in light of economic conditions, providing counties with a more stable revenue source for essential services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB345 appears to be supportive; many stakeholders see it as a necessary adjustment that responds to inflationary pressures. Public discussions emphasize the bill's potential to aid local governments in managing and ameliorating blight through dedicated funding. However, there may be concerns regarding the general public's willingness to accept fee increases, with some constituents hesitant about any new costs imposed by local government.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB345 primarily focus on the balance between increasing fees and the economic burden on residents. Some critics may argue that the additional fee, even if minimal, could disproportionately affect lower-income households or potential home buyers. The debate may also include differing opinions on the appropriateness and effectiveness of using these funds for demolition efforts, especially in areas where other solutions could be considered for community improvement.