Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB510

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25

Caption

Providing for Compassionate Name Change Assistance Grant Program and for powers and duties of the Department of Community and Economic Development; establishing the Compassionate Name Change Assistance Grant Fund; and making an appropriation.

Impact

The legislation is expected to have a positive impact on state law by providing structured support for individuals undergoing name changes, particularly benefiting marginalized groups such as transgender and nonbinary individuals. It facilitates access to legal and social assistance, ensuring that those facing discrimination have the resources they need to navigate the often difficult and personal process of changing their name. This can contribute to greater inclusivity and recognition within state legal frameworks.

Summary

Senate Bill 510 aims to establish the Compassionate Name Change Assistance Grant Program in Pennsylvania, which will provide financial support to eligible organizations that assist individuals in navigating the name change process. The bill outlines the creation of the Compassionate Name Change Assistance Grant Fund, which will be funded in part by a transfer of $2 million from the General Fund. Eligible applicants for grants include nonprofit organizations and local governments that cater to individuals who experience biases based on gender or sexual stereotypes during name changes.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 510 has been positive among advocacy groups and legislators who view the grant program as a necessary step towards supporting vulnerable populations in Pennsylvania. They emphasize the importance of providing protective measures and assistance to those who may face discrimination or difficulties when trying to change their names. However, some concerns may arise regarding the allocation of funds and the effectiveness of the program in addressing the needs of the community adequately.

Contention

Key points of contention could revolve around the allocation of funds and the criteria for eligibility to receive grants. Some stakeholders may question whether $2 million is sufficient to meet the needs of those seeking support and whether the criteria for awarding grants are stringent enough to ensure that funds are channeled effectively to those who will benefit most. Additionally, there may be debates on how well the program can adapt to evolving social dynamics and the complexities of the name change process in the context of gender identity.