Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB552

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/4/25
• Refer: 4/4/25

Caption

In emergency management services, providing for emergency response payment; and imposing penalties.

Impact

If enacted, SB552 will significantly alter the landscape of emergency response funding in Pennsylvania. Currently, volunteer fire companies often face financial challenges related to the costs incurred during emergency responses. By making individuals financially responsible for emergency-related costs, this bill could potentially streamline funding for fire companies and ensure they are compensated adequately for their services. This change would encourage timely responses to emergencies, knowing that financial reimbursement is a structured process.

Summary

Senate Bill 552, introduced in the Pennsylvania General Assembly, aims to amend Title 35 (Health and Safety) by establishing a formal process for reimbursement of emergency response costs incurred by fire companies. The bill outlines definitions and procedures regarding emergency incidents, specifically focusing on the financial responsibility linked to fire companies responding to emergencies as directed by official dispatch. It ensures that individuals involved in emergencies are liable for reasonable response costs and that insurers will reimburse fire companies for these costs, establishing a clear billing procedure.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB552 appears to be supportive among emergency services advocates who argue that such measures are necessary to ensure firefighters are appropriately compensated for their efforts. However, the bill may raise concerns among individuals or groups who feel that placing financial responsibility on people involved in emergencies could deter them from seeking necessary help. The debate reflects a broader discussion about balancing adequate emergency response funding while ensuring public welfare and access to emergency services.

Contention

Notably, some lawmakers and stakeholders might argue against the bill due to potential hardships it may impose on individuals facing emergencies. The requirement for reimbursement from individuals raises concerns about who bears the financial burden during crises. Additionally, the penalties for fire companies submitting false reimbursement requests could spark debate about the fairness of such measures, especially if they unintentionally affect volunteer fire companies aiming to serve their communities without the motive of financial gain.