Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB584

Introduced
4/9/25  

Caption

Designating a bridge, identified as Bridge Key 56035, carrying U.S. Route 422 over State Route 2005 and Cherry Run in Plumcreek Township, Armstrong County, as the George W. McAuley, Jr. Memorial Bridge.

Impact

The bill will affect the naming protocols of state infrastructure by establishing a precedent for memorializing individuals who have made significant contributions to public service and transportation. It reinforces the state's commitment to recognizing public servants and highlights their contributions in an everlasting manner, thereby enhancing the cultural significance of bridges as communal landmarks.

Summary

Senate Bill 584 seeks to designate a specific bridge, known as Bridge Key 56035, which carries U.S. Route 422 over State Route 2005 and Cherry Run in Plumcreek Township, Armstrong County, as the George W. McAuley, Jr. Memorial Bridge. This designation serves to honor the late George W. McAuley, Jr., who had a noteworthy career with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and contributed significantly to highway safety and infrastructure improvements in the state. The bill reflects an effort by the General Assembly to commemorate individuals who have made a positive impact on the community.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 584 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, with legislators and community members expressing support for the recognition of George W. McAuley, Jr.'s contributions. There is a common understanding of the importance of honoring individuals who serve the public, indicating broad consensus on the need for such memorials. This bill is likely viewed as a tribute that will foster pride and remembrance within the community.

Contention

While no significant points of contention are evident in the discussions surrounding SB 584, the bill's focus on memorialization of public figures may open up larger conversations about how these designations are chosen and the criteria applied for future memorials. The potential for differing opinions on which individuals deserve such honors could arise in future legislative debates, but for this specific bill, the recognition of Mr. McAuley is seen as well-deserved.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.