Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'tangible personal property'
Page 43 of 55
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- He was fun-loving; he was the type of person that everyone
- What happens to the person if the camera is turned off?
- I am just a person who’s looking in on a situation, but it does trouble me.
- I just wanted to personally say I'm so sorry for your loss. Thank you so much.
- These are misdemeanor offenses if the person has committed two or more.
Keywords:
community supervision, repeat offenders, intoxication, Texas Penal Code, criminal justice reform, intoxication manslaughter, criminal penalties, community supervision, mandatory supervision, parole eligibility, Grayson's Law, mental health, trauma, jailers, law enforcement, occupational health, diligent participation, state jail felony, criminal justice reform, time credits
Summary:
The meeting of the committee focused on several significant bills addressing public safety and reform within the correctional system. Notably, HB2103 was discussed, which aims to provide mental health leave for correctional officers, amid growing concerns about their wellbeing due to the psychological stress associated with their duties. Support was voiced by various stakeholders, highlighting the need for better support systems for officers facing trauma related to their jobs. This bill was aimed at recognizing the critical role that mental health plays in maintaining a safe working environment for those in the corrections field.
In another part of the meeting, HB2017 sparked heated debates, as it sought to instate stricter penalties for intoxication manslaughter committed by undocumented individuals. The discussion brought forth views on fairness and the implications of distinguishing sentences based on immigration status. Several witnesses offered testimony, both for and against the bill, leading to a contentious atmosphere that reflected the broader societal debates about immigration and public safety. Overall, the meeting highlighted the challenges of reforming laws while considering the variables of mental health and immigration status in the context of public safety.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Criminal Jurisprudence May 6th, 2025 at 08:05 am
House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- The bill has a cap of $3,000 per tattoo removal, and the person requesting removal has to apply through
- Specifically, the bill expands Texas's rape shield protections to include trafficking of persons.
- and continuous trafficking of persons.
- And I know you're not the person. But I can think back to a case.
- We know that family violence is an intensely personal experience.
Keywords:
intoxication, assault, criminal penalty, Bodily injury, serious bodily injury, law enforcement, emergency services, public safety, juvenile justice, legal representation, House Bill 437, House Bill 507, Senate Bill 40, public testimony, legislative procedures, bail bond payments
Summary:
The meeting convened to discuss various bills primarily focused on juvenile justice and legal representation standards. Notable discussions included House Bill 437, which addresses the placement of youth in detention facilities according to regulations, as explained by Representative Cook. House Bill 507, which pertains to legal representation for indigent defendants, also sparked a debate that resulted in tight voting, showcasing the divergent opinions among committee members. Additionally, Senate Bill 40 underwent a reconsideration, reflecting substantial amendments aimed at balancing non-profit and for-profit entity payments related to bail bonds, which highlighted the complexities of legislative amendments and the procedural adherence required to maintain order in discussions.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I personally felt this discrimination.
- A person who would actually perform the surgery?
- I'm here today in my personal capacity.
- The ability of a person or facility to continue providing care while paying the penalty.
- 30 minutes, but by a non-custodial person.
Keywords:
dentistry, botulinum toxin, aesthetic treatments, dental regulation, training, medical staff privileges, hospital administration, healthcare regulation, Texas Health and Safety Code, consistency in privileges, physician health, regulation, surcharges, occupational licensing, national practitioner data bank, healthcare, training, abuse, neglect, penalties
Summary:
The meeting primarily focused on discussions surrounding mental health and homelessness, particularly through the lens of SB2487, which aims to provide better mental health services and support systems for individuals in crisis. Testimonies highlighted the shortcomings of current interventions, which often lead to incarceration rather than treatment, and emphasized the need for a centralized hub to assist people experiencing mental health crises. Various stakeholders, including city officials and social service representatives, voiced their support for the bill, citing its potential to improve access to care and reduce the burden on emergency services, such as jails and hospitals. However, concerns were raised regarding the implementation and the potential for coercion in treatment options, suggesting that the bill could undermine established rights to voluntary mental health care.
The committee also addressed SB437, which pertains to modernizing training for substance use disorder providers in Texas, and SB660, regarding safety measures for emergency rooms. The overall tone of the meeting reflected a commitment to reforming how the state handles mental health crises and the intersection of homelessness, with a clear push for systems that prioritize compassionate care rather than punitive measures.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- It means any person that...
- The bill talks about more than that—any person.
- At least one person who...
- You personally? Me personally, but from a local school.
- Today, I'm testifying in my personal capacity...
Keywords:
electric power, interconnection, utilities, ERCOT, large load customers, water supply, sewer service, demand management, Senate Bill 33, Senate Bill 11, abortion, taxpayer funding, healthcare access, government overreach, local control
Summary:
The committee meeting was centered around the discussion of two key bills: SB33 and SB11. SB33 received significant attention as it aimed to close loopholes related to local government funding for abortion travel, which several representatives argued was an overreach of governmental power. Testimonies from supporters highlighted the need for this bill to clarify taxpayer protections, while opponents raised concerns about infringing on local autonomy and access to healthcare. The discussion featured passionate inputs from various stakeholders, emphasizing the societal implications of legislations regarding reproductive rights and healthcare services. At the conclusion of deliberations, both bills were left pending, indicating that further consideration is required before moving forward.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- That may have potential, depending on, you know, what that person is doing with that impersonation of
- It has potential to be both, but I would not lean towards that, sir, personally.
- And although continuous smuggling of a person is a horrible offense, it usually is...
- I would also submit that continuous smuggling of a person is probably a no.
- To your point, the vast majority of smuggling of persons...
Keywords:
firearm acquisition, gun smuggling, criminal offenses, ammunition, terrorism, public safety, HCR40, HB214, border security, Operation Lone Star, public testimony, firearm offenses, terrorism, legislation
Summary:
The committee convened to discuss two significant bills: HCR40, regarding reimbursement for border security costs, and HB214, which addresses the prosecution of firearm and ammunition-related offenses. Senator Flores represented HCR40, urging Congress to reimburse Texas for expenses incurred under Operation Lone Star, citing ongoing issues with illegal crossings and drug trafficking. Though there was a commendable attempt at public testimony, none was received, and the bill was left pending with intentions for further discussions. Much emphasis was placed on the state's security responsibilities and federal inaction that led to a substantial financial burden on Texas taxpayers.
In discussing HB214 introduced by Chairman Birdwell, key points included the need for refinement in identifying which offenses classify as terroristic. The members engaged in a comprehensive debate surrounding the expansion of offenses related to firearms smuggling and terrorism. Members expressed concern over including overly broad definitions that could lead to misuse of power and mislabeling of offenses. The committee's focus shifted towards creating a more precise framework that separates economic offenses from true acts of terrorism. The meeting emphasized collaboration and careful consideration in drafting legislation aimed at enhancing public safety without infringing on rights.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- ...person incarcerated for longer.
- The person is on community supervision, what we call probation, if it's a term and condition.
- The person I asked, they weren't really sure what the answer was.
- They can also set special conditions when that person is released as well.
- I mean, this was a person that used a car as a weapon. I don't see how it's different.
Keywords:
community supervision, repeat offenders, intoxication, Texas Penal Code, criminal justice reform, intoxication manslaughter, criminal penalties, community supervision, mandatory supervision, parole eligibility, Grayson's Law, mental health, trauma, jailers, law enforcement, occupational health, diligent participation, state jail felony, criminal justice reform, time credits
Summary:
The recent meeting of the committee primarily focused on two bills, HB1482 and HB2341, aimed at addressing public safety and rehabilitation in the context of repeat offenders, particularly in relation to intoxicated driving offenses. The discussions highlighted personal testimonies from victims' families and experts advocating for stricter accountability measures against repeat offenders. Representative Leo Wilson emphasized the necessity of such laws to prevent future tragedies stemming from intoxicated driving, citing heart-wrenching cases that have affected the community. The committee also heard contrasting views regarding the effectiveness of increased incarceration versus rehabilitation efforts for offenders, with calls for a balanced approach to ensure public safety without neglecting rehabilitation needs.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I personally have not.
- I guess my personal measure of success would be...
- I think I've attended 11 in-person field hearings on redistricting, no, 12.
- In closing, like I said, members, and all of us here personally, on relationships.
- Are these 12 hearings virtual hearings, or are they in-person hearings?
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting centered around the discussion of congressional redistricting, where the committee established the procedures to ensure a fair and transparent process. Led by Senator King, the session focused on adopting a resolution that authorized a special committee dedicated to congressional redistricting and allowed for regional hearings to gather public input via videoconferencing. Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate notice for public participation, especially from marginalized communities potentially affected by proposed changes. Disagreements emerged regarding the timeline for regional hearings and how to address the implications of the redistricting process on minority districts. Overall, participants acknowledged the complex nature of redistricting and the importance of engaging constituents in the legislative process.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
S/C on Juvenile Justice Mar 26th, 2025 at 10:30 am
House S/C on Juvenile Justice
Transcript Highlights:
- up close and personal.
- ...or a young person for life.
- I lived through the system as a young person and I...
- I'm the first person...
- And if there was one person I grew up scared of, that was my dad.
Keywords:
housing, affordable housing, state regulations, zoning, local government authority, drug court, juvenile justice, diversion programs, rehabilitation, criminal justice reform, juvenile justice, remote proceedings, depositions, virtual hearings, court technology, criminal responsibility, juvenile justice, age of maturity, expungement, mental health services
Summary:
The meeting primarily focused on discussions surrounding HB2234, which aims to raise the age of criminal responsibility in Texas. There was a strong consensus among witnesses advocating for the change, citing the psychological and social implications of prosecuting 17-year-olds as adults. Several testimonies highlighted the damages inflicted by adult incarceration on youth, recommending a shift towards juvenile systems that provide rehabilitative support tailored for younger individuals. Chairman Dutton acknowledged the historical significance of this session's discussion, emphasizing the need for legislative change to align Texas with national trends and prioritize youth rehabilitation over punishment. The committee remains engaged in discussions on how to effectively implement this legislation, considering fiscal impacts and community needs.
The meeting concluded with the bill left pending due to ongoing concerns regarding the financial implications for counties and the judicial system. A diverse panel of advocates, including youth service organizations and legal professionals, reinforced the argument that raising the age is not merely a matter of policy but an essential aspect of ensuring fair treatment and rehabilitation for young individuals in the justice system.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- and memories, the very essence of that person.
- That's a touching testimony, a personal testimony.
- Because the effects of it are broader than just the person.
- I always recognize this person here because of his hairstyle.
- Our journey with dementia is personal.
Keywords:
dementia, research institute, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, funding, grants, state health initiatives, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, research funding, state budget, prevention, healthcare, medical research, Dementia Prevention and Research Institute, dementia, Alzheimer's, SB5, SJR3
Summary:
The meeting focused on important legislative considerations surrounding dementia and healthcare funding in Texas. Discussions were centered on SB5 and SJR3, which aim to establish the Dementia Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (DPRIT) and enhance funding for dementia research and prevention efforts. Senators highlighted the urgency of addressing the growing prevalence of dementia, emphasizing that nearly half of nursing home residents suffer from Alzheimer's or other related disorders. Public testimonies from experts and advocates underscored the need for research funding and the dire need for comprehensive care that could affect millions of Texans.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025 at 10:08 am
House Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- That's me personally, because I believe in transparency, but you know, I'm protected by the.
- This one says "confidential" in all persons. That's very broad.
- The list could go on so that people can't nitpick their personal lives also.
- Because one person may intend one thing, but who's to say that that is what every person voting on this
- You have that one-person agency or that two-person agency
Bills:
SB15
Keywords:
law enforcement, department file, employee records, misconduct, confidentiality, Texas occupations code, SB15, law enforcement, transparency, public accountability, misconduct, Uvalde shooting, confidentiality
Summary:
The committee meeting centered around the discussion of SB15, which aims to standardize record-keeping protocols for law enforcement agencies across the state. It received a mixed reception from committee members and witnesses, with significant concern raised regarding its potential to obscure misconduct and limit public transparency. Public testimony included strong dissent from individuals and organizations advocating for greater accountability in policing, who argued that the bill could enable law enforcement agencies to suppress critical information under the guise of confidentiality. Significant dialogue pertained to the implications of the bill in light of recent events that highlighted the need for transparency in police conduct, particularly in controversial cases such as the Uvalde school shooting. Ultimately, the bill was passed out of committee with minimal opposition.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
My personal cell phone's on there.
- Personal.
- It's going to mean something personally to them.
- Well, I can speak to a personal example.
- And yes, the person that follows that wrong...
Keywords:
early voting, ballot correction, voting rights, election integrity, mail-in voting, voter notification, election reporting, candidate percentages, voting results, transparency, electoral reform, election procedures, civil penalty, public officials, election standards, Texas Election Code, voter registration, online application, acknowledgment, elections
Summary:
The House Committee on Elections convened to discuss HB3709, a bill focused on reforming the post-election audit process. Representative Dialo presented the bill, emphasizing its bipartisan support and the critical need for modernization to enhance the integrity and transparency of the voting process. The existing auditing method, which relied on random precinct selection, was criticized for being outdated and inefficient. The proposed changes aim to standardize audits across various voting methods, allowing election officials to evaluate results by voting locations instead of individual precincts, and thus improving accuracy and efficiency.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- If it's not a personal liability on the person who is committing the offense, then that would mean the
- how a person voted.
- The only purpose of the photo ID is to prove that the person coming to vote is the person who is on the
- I have personally...
- But the other person who didn't— that person is disenfranchised.
Keywords:
voter ID, citizenship proof, provisional ballot, election security, Texas, voting rights, deep fakes, misleading videos, election integrity, criminal offense, digital misinformation, deep fakes, misleading videos, election integrity, criminal offense, digital misinformation, Texas, misleading videos, deep fake, election integrity
Summary:
The committee meeting focused on several key legislative bills relating to election integrity and voter registration. Notable discussions were held around HB817, HB1478, and HB1661, which addressed issues such as the termination of majority votes, compliance with voter registration laws, and penalties related to election supplies. Throughout the meeting, various representatives vocalized their opinions, alongside public testimonies that provided diverse perspectives on the bills being considered. The chair led the proceedings efficiently, allowing for a balance of viewpoints while ensuring that legislative business was conducted promptly. Overall, the atmosphere was characterized by active engagement from members of the committee, with many bills being reported favorably to the full House for consideration.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I have not personally made any analysis that you've referenced.
- I don't have any personal knowledge. Have you ever heard of that? No.
- They're losing two persons to do that now.
- So, based on what someone else told you, not based on your personal experience or personal verification
- You can take it as a yes that I did not personally do so. Thank you.
Keywords:
disaster relief, emergency preparedness, flood management, local government grants, meteorological forecasting, state appropriations, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, abortion, civil liability, abortion-inducing drugs, qui tam actions, Texas Citizens Participation Act, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, healthcare regulations, judicial branch, court security
Summary:
The committee meeting primarily focused on the discussion of HB4, which pertains to redistricting. Chairman King emphasized the legal compliance of the proposed map and elaborated on its political advantages, stating that the map improves compactness while benefiting Republican candidates. The meeting saw extensive public testimony, with numerous participants voicing concerns about the map's legality and its implications on minority representation. Representative Smith highlighted that the overwhelming majority of public submissions expressed opposition to the redistricting bill, arguing that it disregards the constituents' voices. Debate ensued regarding the necessity and legality of the changes made, particularly concerning minority districts.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- I personally have not.
- So I would have a lot of questions for the person that signed that.
- Beyond that, I have no personal knowledge of any facts behind that DOJ letter.
- and to hear from witnesses and to hear testimony in person.
- I think I've attended 11 in-person field hearings on redistricting. No, 12.
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting focused primarily on the congressional redistricting resolution prompted by the governor's request due to constitutional concerns flagged by the U.S. Department of Justice. Members discussed the procedural steps necessary to establish a special committee on congressional redistricting, emphasizing the need for transparency and public participation. Concerns were raised about the limited number of planned regional hearings and the implications for community input. A strong commitment to include public testimony through both in-person and virtual means was stated, ensuring that Texans can engage with the process regardless of their geographical location.
Discussions included the necessity of adopting prior successful procedures similar to those in past sessions, with an acknowledgment of the unique challenges posed by current legal requirements. Members expressed varying viewpoints on balancing the need for thorough public participation while addressing logistical challenges inherent in the redistricting process. Overall, the meeting demonstrated a collaborative atmosphere aimed at crafting a fair and lawful redistricting plan while acknowledging the diverse opinions of constituents throughout Texas.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- person, or relying on a person to make the report.
- This is personal for me as I have a very close friend whose child was violated.
- That's what we're asking for: is for the person that sees it.
- It doesn't go to one person that's trying to protect the integrity.
- And that person then brings a lawsuit, and you're indemnified by an insurance company.
Bills:
HB2646, HB3941, HB5153, HB5155, HB5394, HB1106, HB426, HB4529, HB3984, HB4273, HB1097, HB3940, HB1941, HB4377, HB3153
Keywords:
child care, task force, high-quality care, affordability, prekindergarten partnerships, foster care, transitional living, Medicaid reform, youth assistance, independent living, services for youth, employment training, educational support, mental health services, health care, public health, child health program, reimbursement, local health entities, maternal health
Summary:
The meeting of the committee focused on several key bills related to health care and adoption services, with a significant emphasis on fostering care systems. Vice Chair Emanuel presented bills that aimed to streamline reporting requirements for the HHSC, while Representative Slauson's bill on voluntary adoption registries prompted a discussion on improving access and procedures within the child welfare system. Each bill was generally met with favorable votes, indicating strong bipartisan support for these initiatives. The committee heard testimonies from various stakeholders who voiced the importance of these legislative efforts in enhancing the quality of life for children and families involved in the welfare system. Notably, the committee also tackled the issue of Medicaid services and accessibility for children needing medical equipment like baby helmets, which have been a burden for many low-income families.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- The defendant has no personal right to privacy on the information from their ankle monitor, as it has
- An ankle monitor is only as good as the person who wants to honor it.
- We want to intervene before the person suffering from mental illness becomes a victim, harms someone
- Because the last thing that a prosecutor wants to do is prosecute an innocent person.
- It must be issued at the time the arrested person is brought before the magistrate.
Bills:
SB330, SB663, SB1020, SB1152, SB1164, SB1896, SB2111, SB2196, SB2383, SB2581, SB2797, SB2798, SB2371
Keywords:
county funding, prosecutors' offices, elections, law enforcement, local government, community supervision, budget approval, corrections department, strategic plan, judicial oversight, emergency protection, arrest information, victim rights, magistrate duties, criminal procedure, emergency protection, legal order, victim protection, criminal justice, Texas legislation
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Committee on Criminal Justice covered a range of legislative measures focusing primarily on the improvement of mental health services and clarifying procedural aspects of emergency detention for individuals experiencing mental illness. Key bills, such as SB1164, which aims to enhance emergency detention procedures, were discussed. Testimonies from both supporters and critics highlighted the need for clear standards in mental health emergencies to ensure that due process is maintained while providing necessary care. The committee also addressed concerns around legislation impacting community supervision and administration, exemplified by SB663, and how it could streamline budget processes for local agencies. Overall, the discussions emphasized balancing public safety with mental health needs and ensuring fair representation in the judicial process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- personal bond, they can still set up a bond to get out.
- We are also making sure that if a person Defendants out
- on bond, and that person commits a second offense, that person goes back to the same original judge that
- I think there were these are the new offenses for which a personal bond is automatically prohibited.
- that the person has been indicted.
Bills:
SJR1, SB9, SB40, SJR36, SJR1, SJR5, SB9, SB40, SJR1, SB9, SB40, SR62, SR92, SR95, SR108, SR110, SR111, SR113, SR114, SR117, SR120, SB314, SB314
Keywords:
bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment, law enforcement, bail reform, defendants, pretrial detention, public safety, criminal justice, charitable bail organizations, bail bonds, public funds, political subdivision, injunctive relief, taxpayer rights, bail denial, illegal aliens, felony offenses, constitutional amendment
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate addressed significant legislative changes regarding bail procedures and the use of public funds in bail payments. Notably, the committee reviewed SB9 and SB40, both aimed at tightening regulations surrounding bail bonds and enhancing public safety. Senator Huffman presented an amendment to SB9 that allows judges to reassess bail after indictments, especially in cases of violent offenders, reiterating the need for strict bail practices to protect victims and communities. Additionally, SB40 introduces restrictions on the use of public funds by local governments to cover bail for defendants, addressing public concerns over the transparency and safety implications of such practices.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- In exchange, if a person is compelled to testify, ...while
- claiming that the testimony or document may incriminate the person, Texas law grants the person complete
- immunity from prosecution, such that the person may not be indicted or prosecuted for any matter related
- ...meaning that the testimony or evidence a person must produce
- may not be used against the person in a criminal prosecution, but the person can still be indicted for
Bills:
SB16, SB76, SB310, SB311, SB396, SB505, SB827, SB964, SB1209, SB1210, SB1386, SB1470, SB2035, SJR37
Keywords:
voter registration, proof of citizenship, Election Code, criminal offenses, limited federal ballot, transportation, infrastructure, funding, public safety, state regulation, election, polling places, voter access, state oversight, electronic voting, voting, polling place, elections, countywide program, voter access
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Committee on State Affairs was marked by significant discussions surrounding several bills, primarily focusing on jurisdictional changes within the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. One of the key bills discussed was SB1210, which aims to clarify the roles and jurisdictions of these two courts, ensuring that when constitutional interpretations are at issue, the Supreme Court serves as the final authority. Testimony was provided by various stakeholders including judges and legal experts, who articulated both support for and concerns about the potential implications of these changes. The conversation highlighted the historical context of the dual court system in Texas, outlining its benefits and drawbacks, particularly in ensuring consistency in the application of constitutional law.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 26th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- of color, and certainly persons not represented by a party.
- I am personally against this proposal.
- I wanted to let you know that in Houston, there is an in-person hearing taking place.
- So again, I'm not going to press upon the need for an in-person...
- At this time, we have one person...
Summary:
The Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting convened to gather public input regarding redistricting in the North Texas region. With an emphasis on improving public participation, several committee members expressed the need for in-person hearings, highlighting the limitations of virtual formats. Despite technical glitches, participants were encouraged to provide testimony via video conference. Notably, one citizen voiced concerns about the legislature's shift away from traditional redistricting processes, arguing that mid-decade changes undermine fair representation. The committee reiterated its commitment to collecting public opinion and plans to hold future hearings in different regions of Texas.