Rhode Island House Bill H7662

Rhode Island 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/22
• Refer: 3/2/22

Caption

House Resolution Respectfully Requesting The Department Of Administration To Conduct A Study On The Technical And Economic Outcomes Of Decarbonizing Rhode Island By 2030, With The Aim Of Creating The Maximum Amount Of Revenue For The State, Through A Request For Proposal (rfp) Contract Not To Exceed $2,500,000

Impact

If enacted, this resolution could lead to significant changes in state policies regarding energy production and consumption. It outlines a request for a detailed evaluation of energy efficiency strategies and technologies that could be implemented. Notable areas of study include the analysis of vertical axis wind turbines, micro-grids, and the feasibility of producing surplus energy for export. This could promote a shift toward more sustainable energy practices within the state's infrastructure and potentially create economic opportunities through new energy markets.

Summary

House Resolution H7662 requests the Department of Administration to conduct a comprehensive study on the technical and economic outcomes of decarbonizing Rhode Island by 2030. The intention is to explore methods that could maximize revenue for the state while significantly reducing carbon emissions. The resolution emphasizes the importance of transitioning to a carbon-free economy and recognizes that decarbonization is fundamental in addressing climate change, which is aggravated by carbon emissions from various sectors of the economy.

Contention

While the resolution aims to build a sustainable future, there will likely be differing opinions on its implications. Some stakeholders may raise concerns about the costs associated with the study, which is limited to a budget of $2.5 million, and whether those funds would lead to tangible benefits. Additionally, issues surrounding the effectiveness of proposed technologies and environmental impacts during the transition might spark debates among policymakers and community members. Proponents may argue this is a necessary step toward combatting climate change, while opponents could highlight the risks of disrupting existing ecosystems and industries.