Rhode Island 2022 Regular Session

Rhode Island House Bill H7936

Introduced
3/7/22  

Caption

State Tax Officials

Impact

The legislation impacts existing laws significantly by removing district court involvement in tax appeals, thus shifting all related matters to the superior court. This centralization could facilitate a more uniform approach to tax adjudications, potentially aiding in the consistency of case outcomes. Furthermore, it establishes new procedural requirements, such as the necessity for taxpayers to prepay all disputable taxes, penalties, and interest before appealing. However, taxpayers can motion for exemption from this prepayment requirement under specific circumstances, which introduces a component aimed at protecting financially disadvantaged taxpayers.

Summary

House Bill H7936 aims to reform the jurisdictional framework for tax appeals in Rhode Island. Effective January 1, 2023, the bill grants exclusive jurisdiction to the superior court in Providence and Bristol counties for all appeals related to final decisions made by the tax administrator. This encompasses a wide range of tax issues including assessments, deficiencies, claim refunds, licenses, and permits. The bill seeks to centralize tax matters which were previously addressed in district courts, therefore streamlining the process for taxpayers and tax officials alike.

Conclusion

Overall, H7936 represents a substantial shift in how tax disputes are handled in Rhode Island, promoting a streamlined judicial process while navigating the complexities inherent in tax law and its impacts on various taxpayer demographics. As this bill advances, it will be essential to monitor its implementation and the responses from both taxpayers and tax officials to ensure that its objectives are met without adversely affecting taxpayers’ access to fair reviews of tax matters.

Contention

Notably, this bill includes provisions allowing taxpayers to challenge the prepayment condition. These taxpayers must demonstrate a reasonable probability of success on the merits of their appeal and a lack of financial ability to cover the prepayment. This clause has attracted attention as it seeks to balance the administrative efficiency desired by state officials with the protection of taxpayer rights. Furthermore, existing court procedures from the district courts will be revoked, which could generate concerns regarding accessibility and the potential impact on low-income taxpayers who may face challenges in litigation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1651

Community colleges: academic employees: involuntary administrative leave.

RI S2805

State Tax Officials

NV SB160

Revises provisions relating to the Nevada Equal Rights Commission. (BDR 18-82)

AZ HB2391

Video services providers; enforcement; jurisdiction

IA SF2378

A bill for an act relating to the board of educational examiners, including by modifying provisions related to the time in which complaints concerning licensed school employees having romantic or otherwise inappropriate relationships with students can be investigated, the mandatory reporting of licensed school employees who engage in grooming behavior toward students or the abuse of students, and reporting requirements related to the investigation of complaints against licensees and unlicensed school employees.(Formerly SSB 3050.)

CA AB333

Whistleblower protection: county patients’ rights advocates.

CA SB306

Retaliation actions: complaints: administrative review.

CA AB1518

Criminal justice information.