If passed, the bill would modify the definition of 'owner' in the context of liability limitations, explicitly excluding the state and municipalities. This implies that private landowners would have more protection against liability claims linked to public use of their lands for recreational activities like hunting, fishing, or hiking. The amendment is designed to make it easier for landowners to allow the public to access their properties without the anxiety of being sued, thereby promoting greater public engagement with natural spaces and recreational opportunities.
Summary
House Bill 5363 seeks to amend the existing legislation regarding the public use of private lands in Rhode Island, specifically related to the limitations of liability for landowners. The primary aim is to redefine the terms which govern how landowners can be held liable when individuals use their lands for recreational activities. This change is intended to encourage private landowners to open their properties for public enjoyment without the fear of legal repercussions arising from accidents or injuries sustained on their property.
Contention
Despite its intentions, the bill may face opposition from various advocacy groups concerned about public safety and land management. Critics may argue that limiting liability could potentially lead to negligence on the part of landowners, as they might not feel compelled to maintain safe conditions on their properties if their legal exposure is reduced. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the balance of public rights to access versus private property rights and how these two interests can coexist in legislation.
Changes the definition of owner to exclude the state and municipalities for the purposes of liability limitations relating to public use of private lands.