Rhode Island 2024 Regular Session

Rhode Island House Bill H7266

Introduced
1/24/24  

Caption

Establishes guidelines for the operation of virtual currency (crypto) kiosks.

Impact

If enacted, HB 7266 will amend Chapter 19-14.3 of the General Laws, thereby imposing regulations on operators of virtual currency kiosks. The new regulations aim to enhance consumer protection by requiring kiosks to divulge important transaction details, such as fees, exchange rates, and potential risks associated with virtual currency transactions. Furthermore, it establishes a maximum daily transaction limit of $2,500 per customer and allows customers to cancel their first transaction with an operator within 72 hours for a full refund under specific conditions.

Summary

House Bill 7266, introduced in January 2024 by Representatives Casimiro, Noret, and others, aims to establish comprehensive guidelines for the operation of virtual currency kiosks in Rhode Island. The bill provides definitions relevant to the operation of these kiosks and the transactions they facilitate, encompassing aspects of currency transmission, virtual currencies, and the roles of owners and operators. Notable components include requirements for operators to disclose transaction risks and conditions to customers in a clear and conspicuous manner before any virtual currency transaction takes place.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 7266 represents a significant legislative effort aimed at integrating modern financial technology into the existing regulatory framework, reflecting an awareness of the growing prevalence and complexity of virtual currency transactions. The implications of this bill could influence how businesses operate within this emerging sector as well as how consumers interact with financial technologies.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HB 7266 may arise regarding the balance between regulating the burgeoning virtual currency industry and ensuring consumer protection without overly restricting market participation. Proponents are likely to argue that the bill provides necessary safeguards against fraud and technical failures associated with virtual currency operations. Detractors, however, may express concerns that such strict regulations could inhibit the growth of virtual currency startups and limit consumer options, adversely affecting market competition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB618

Transactions and use taxes: City of Scotts Valley: City of Emeryville.

CA AB3259

Transactions and use taxes: City of Campbell: City of Pinole: County of Solano.

CA AB2598

Crimes: money laundering.

CA SB319

Criminal justice statistics: reporting.

CA SB703

Transactions and use taxes: Counties of Alameda and Santa Clara and City of Santa Fe Springs.

CA AB2443

Transactions and use taxes: Cities of Lancaster, Palmdale, and Victorville.

CA SB152

Transactions and use taxes: County of Sonoma.

CA SB335

Transactions and use taxes: County of Santa Clara.