Requires renovation projects of pre-1978 buildings to comply with provisions of chapter 24.6 of title 23 and chapter 21 of title 28, and require presence of lead inspector and supervisor and require lead training. DLT would ensure compliance.
Impact
The bill aims to improve public health and safety by mandating that all individuals and companies involved in renovation projects receive appropriate training and supervision concerning lead hazards. By requiring a lead work supervisor to be present on-site for the duration of a project, the legislation ensures compliance with safety protocols and minimizes the risk of lead exposure. Additionally, the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training (DLT) is given the authority to enforce these standards, underscoring the state's commitment to lead hazard mitigation.
Summary
Bill S3111, introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly, focuses on lead hazard mitigation in renovation projects for buildings constructed before 1978. The main provisions require compliance with established regulations related to lead poisoning prevention and hazardous substances. Specifically, any renovation work on such buildings must adhere to the stipulations laid out in the lead poisoning prevention act and the hazardous substances right-to-know act, ensuring that all necessary health and safety precautions are taken to protect workers and residents alike during the renovation process. The legislation highlights the need for a lead inspector and requires that a lead contractor are engaged on these projects.
Contention
While the bill is primarily focused on enhancing safety standards, there may be contention regarding the potential increased costs and regulatory burdens imposed on contractors and developers involved in renovation projects. Critics could argue that the requirements for lead training and supervision might slow down renovation timelines and increase costs. Furthermore, there may be concerns about the implications on the availability of housing and businesses, particularly in older buildings that require extensive renovations under these new regulations. This could spark debates over balancing public health priorities with economic implications within the construction industry.