Rhode Island House Bill H5083

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/25
• Refer: 1/16/25
• Report Pass: 2/25/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/21/25

Caption

Requires public or private golf courses to have an automated external defibrillator on the premises.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5083 would directly influence health and safety regulations concerning public spaces, particularly golf courses. The requirement for AEDs aligns with similar mandates for healthcare facilities and other crowded public areas. Advocates argue that this legislation could significantly increase survival rates in cases of sudden cardiac arrest, thereby contributing to a healthier community environment. The bill emphasizes the responsibility of facility operators to ensure that adequate emergency response measures are in place.

Summary

House Bill 5083, known as the 'David Casey Act', focuses on enhancing public safety by requiring that public or private golf courses maintain an automated external defibrillator (AED) on their premises. The bill aims to ensure that essential medical equipment is readily available in locations where large groups of people may gather, potentially allowing for prompt response in the event of a cardiac emergency. This measure is seen as a proactive step towards improving health and safety standards across public recreational facilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5083 appears to be predominantly positive among proponents who view this legislation as critical for enhancing public safety. Supporters of the bill, including various health advocacy groups and some legislators, argue that the presence of AEDs can save lives and should be standard in places where individuals may engage in physical activity. However, there may be concerns regarding the costs and logistics associated with acquiring and maintaining AEDs in these venues, which could lead to dissent among those who perceive this as an undue financial burden on smaller operators.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise surrounding the enforcement of the AED requirement and the potential implications for golf course operators. Critics might question the practicality of implementing such measures and whether the legislation imposes excessive regulatory burdens without clear pathways for funding or support. Overall, the discussions around HB 5083 highlight a critical balance between enhancing public safety and ensuring that such requirements do not negatively impact the economic viability of recreational spaces.