Rhode Island House Bill H5687

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Report Pass: 6/4/25

Caption

Allows for measures to advance the undergrounding of certain utility cables and to have the same funded through utility rate increases to the cities of Providence and East Providence.

Impact

If enacted, H5687 would amend existing legislation governing the Energy Facility Siting Act by allowing for funding arrangements that involve incremental cost allocations based on actual underground construction expenses. The public utilities commission will ensure that costs are fairly apportioned among the responsible parties and that rate adjustments reflect any funding received from alternate sources. This approach aims to facilitate the construction of underground transmissions lines, which proponents argue will ultimately enhance service reliability and reduce the risk of outages caused by overhead lines.

Summary

House Bill H5687 addresses the undergrounding of certain utility cables specifically related to the E-183 electric transmission line within the cities of Providence and East Providence. The bill authorizes measures to advance the underground project and outlines funding mechanisms, enabling the costs incurred to be passed on to the electric customers of the two cities through utility rate adjustments. This initiative represents an effort to provide a more resilient and aesthetically pleasing electric distribution system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding H5687 appears to be cautiously optimistic, particularly among local authorities and utility companies that support the undergrounding of transmission lines as a necessary infrastructure enhancement. Proponents emphasize the long-term benefits such as reduced maintenance costs, enhanced safety, and improved urban aesthetics. However, there is concern regarding the financial implications for local ratepayers, particularly if costs exceed initial estimates. This potential burden creates an area of contention between utility companies and community stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential financial impact on residents in Providence and East Providence due to the rate adjustments necessary to fund the undergrounding project. Critics may argue against adding costs to consumers' monthly bills, especially if the financial benefits of the undergrounding do not materialize as anticipated. Additionally, the necessity for legislative authorization for funding mechanisms could lead to debates about local governance versus state intervention in funding decisions, highlighting the complex balance between community needs and the broader goals of utility infrastructure development.