Amends the determination of the state's share statute by amending the calculation for the poverty loss stabilization fund.
Impact
The proposed changes in HB 5749 are significant as they could lead to variations in state funding levels across school districts. The bill establishes clearer guidelines for calculating the state's share ratio, taking into consideration the poverty status of students in grades Pre-K to 6. A notable provision is the introduction of a poverty loss stabilization fund to mitigate significant drops in state share ratios, which would provide additional resources to districts facing a decline in state funding, thus ensuring continuity in educational support.
Summary
House Bill 5749, introduced in January 2025, seeks to amend the calculation provisions concerning the state's share of foundation education aid as outlined in the Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act. The bill's primary focus is to redefine how the state's financial contribution to school districts is calculated, particularly by incorporating factors related to revenue-generating capacity and the concentration of high-need students within districts. This change aims to ensure that assistance is more equitably distributed, accounting for varying levels of need among different communities.
Conclusion
Overall, the passage of HB 5749 could represent a progressive step in advancing educational equity in the state, but it also invites substantial discussion on its implementation and long-term consequences for all school districts involved. Stakeholders, including legislators, educators, and community members, will likely continue to debate the merit and efficacy of the proposed fund adjustments and their broader implications on educational opportunities.
Contention
Though supportive discussions of HB 5749 highlight its potential for enhancing educational equity, some concern exists regarding how the amendment may play out in practice. Critics might argue that while adjusting funding calculations aims to target high-need districts, it could inadvertently lead to disparities or less funding for other districts not classified as high-need. Concerns may arise about the management of the poverty loss stabilization fund and whether it will effectively address the needs of districts that suffer financial setbacks.
Amends the method for the calculation of the permanent foundation education aid to school districts, and would make an adjustment based upon students residing in qualified low-income housing.
Prohibits total education aid paid to any local education agency from being reduced by more than one percent (1%) of the municipal education appropriation in the previous fiscal year.
Prohibits total education aid paid to any local education agency from being reduced by more than one percent (1%) of the municipal education appropriation in the previous fiscal year.
Adds multilingual learners into the determination of high-need students and provides a student success factor of twenty-five percent (25%) of the core instruction per-pupil amount and repeals the categorical funding for these students.
Adds multilingual learners into the determination of high-need students and provides a student success factor of twenty-five percent (25%) of the core instruction per-pupil amount and repeals the categorical funding for these students.