Rhode Island House Bill H6036

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/7/25

Caption

Mandates establishment of a support program for nurse practitioners similar to that which is offered for physicians. Additionally, it requires professional licensing and reporting reforms to protect clinicians who seek support.

Impact

The introduction of this bill would significantly affect state policies surrounding clinician support. By mandating the establishment of a nurse practitioner health program (NPHP) and recognizing the physician health program (PHP), the legislation addresses the mental health landscape within healthcare practices. It ensures that clinicians who seek help are protected from automatic reporting to licensing boards, allowing practitioners to focus on health without jeopardizing their careers. The integration of these programs may also foster a healthier work environment, potentially improving clinician retention and patient care outcomes.

Summary

House Bill H6036, known as The Rhode Island Clinician Wellness and Support Act, aims to introduce a structured support program for nurse practitioners similar to those available for physicians. The bill emphasizes the establishment of confidential health programs designed to assist clinicians facing mental health issues, burnout, or substance use disorders. It underscores the need for professional licensing reforms to mitigate the stigma associated with seeking help and provides safe avenues for clinicians to obtain necessary assistance without the fear of disciplinary actions from licensing boards.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding H6036 may arise from concerns regarding the implementation of these support programs and the expected reliance on private organizations for their operation. Some critics may argue about the adequacy of available resources and whether the confidentiality protections truly ensure that clinicians can seek help without fear of repercussions. Additionally, the revisions required for licensing applications to limit mental health inquiries could provoke discussions on the balance between protecting clinician privacy and maintaining patient safety.