Provides a procedure for parking modifications near shoreline rights-of-way.
Impact
If enacted, this legislation will amend Chapter 46-23 of the General Laws concerning the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC). It will establish clear guidelines for modifying parking in relation to public access and ensure local entities consider the needs of individuals with disabilities. Additionally, the CRMC will collaborate with the Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to ensure that proposed changes do not conflict with state or federal accessibility standards. This alignment is crucial for preserving the integrity of public shoreline access and addressing local environmental goals.
Summary
House Bill 6093 aims to regulate the procedure for making parking modifications near shoreline rights-of-way in Rhode Island. The bill mandates that any city, town, municipal agency, or private entity that seeks to restrict or reduce parking in these areas must submit a comprehensive parking plan. This plan should include details on the specific parking areas affected, reasoning for the proposed changes, and an analysis of potential impacts on public shoreline access, with a particular focus on compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Furthermore, a public comment period of at least 30 days is required to gather input from local residents and stakeholders.
Sentiment
The discussions surrounding HB 6093 reflect a sentiment emphasizing the importance of maintaining public access to shoreline areas while concurrently addressing safety and environmental concerns. Supporters of the bill see it as a proactive measure to protect shoreline access and support ADA compliance. Conversely, potential opponents may express concerns regarding the bureaucratic burden that the requirements for public comment and comprehensive planning might present for local municipalities and agencies, potentially leading to delays in necessary parking modifications.
Contention
The bill will also lay down penalties for non-compliance, enabling the CRMC or DEM to impose fines and corrective measures if the provisions are violated. However, exceptions have been included for temporary measures necessary for public safety, which are likely to mitigate concerns related to public safety and traffic flow. The interplay between ensuring public access and meeting the requirements of local governance may lead to debates on the practical implications of enforcing such regulations, including the balance between state control and local flexibility.
Requires written acknowledgment from any buyer of oceanfront or shoreline property that they have been informed of the public's rights and privileges of the shore.
Provides that the legislature would be the body that negotiates on behalf of the state for all activities occurring in, on and over state submerged land extending beyond twenty-five (25) acres.
Replaces the coastal resources management council with a state department of coastal resources and transfers all of the powers and duties between the two (2) authorities.
Requires information on the public's rights and privileges of the shore to be included in disclosure forms for the sale of vacant land or real property.
Provides that the legislature would be the body that negotiates on behalf of the state for all activities occurring in, on and over state submerged land extending beyond twenty-five (25) acres.
Replaces the coastal resources management council with a state department of coastal resources and transfers all of the powers and duties between the two (2) authorities.
Replaces the coastal resources management council with a state department of coastal resources and transfers all of the powers and duties between the two (2) authorities.