Provides a procedure for parking modifications near shoreline rights-of-way.
If enacted, this legislation will amend Chapter 46-23 of the General Laws concerning the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC). It will establish clear guidelines for modifying parking in relation to public access and ensure local entities consider the needs of individuals with disabilities. Additionally, the CRMC will collaborate with the Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to ensure that proposed changes do not conflict with state or federal accessibility standards. This alignment is crucial for preserving the integrity of public shoreline access and addressing local environmental goals.
House Bill 6093 aims to regulate the procedure for making parking modifications near shoreline rights-of-way in Rhode Island. The bill mandates that any city, town, municipal agency, or private entity that seeks to restrict or reduce parking in these areas must submit a comprehensive parking plan. This plan should include details on the specific parking areas affected, reasoning for the proposed changes, and an analysis of potential impacts on public shoreline access, with a particular focus on compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Furthermore, a public comment period of at least 30 days is required to gather input from local residents and stakeholders.
The discussions surrounding HB 6093 reflect a sentiment emphasizing the importance of maintaining public access to shoreline areas while concurrently addressing safety and environmental concerns. Supporters of the bill see it as a proactive measure to protect shoreline access and support ADA compliance. Conversely, potential opponents may express concerns regarding the bureaucratic burden that the requirements for public comment and comprehensive planning might present for local municipalities and agencies, potentially leading to delays in necessary parking modifications.
The bill will also lay down penalties for non-compliance, enabling the CRMC or DEM to impose fines and corrective measures if the provisions are violated. However, exceptions have been included for temporary measures necessary for public safety, which are likely to mitigate concerns related to public safety and traffic flow. The interplay between ensuring public access and meeting the requirements of local governance may lead to debates on the practical implications of enforcing such regulations, including the balance between state control and local flexibility.