South Carolina House Bill H3084

South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/25
• Refer: 1/14/25

Caption

Guardians ad Litem

Impact

If enacted, H3084 will significantly impact the way attorneys are compensated in cases involving guardians ad litem. Currently, there may be instances where fees can be set unilaterally, which can lead to discrepancies and disputes among parties involved. The bill mandates that family court judges outline the method and rate of compensation for guards ad litem at the point of appointment, bringing a structured and consistent approach to attorney fees. This change intends to simplify the financial processes associated with family law cases and protect the interests of all parties, including guardians ad litem, children, and families involved in the judicial system.

Summary

House Bill 3084 seeks to amend Sections 63-3-820 and 63-3-850 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, specifically focusing on the appointment and compensation of attorneys for guardians ad litem. The primary objective of this bill is to ensure that the fees for attorneys appointed for guardians ad litem must be authorized by the court. This requirement aims to enhance judicial oversight of legal fees, preventing unnecessary expenses and ensuring that such costs are justifiable based on the specifics of each case. By implementing this regulation, the bill promotes transparency in the financial aspects of legal representation for guardians ad litem.

Contention

There may be potential areas of contention surrounding H3084, particularly regarding how the amendments interact with existing provisions and the workloads of family court judges. Some may argue that requiring judicial approval for attorney fees could slow down the process of appointing guardians ad litem, especially in urgent cases where immediate decisions are necessary. Additionally, there may be concerns among legal practitioners regarding the flexibility in fee setting and its implications on their practice, as mandated court oversight could limit their ability to negotiate and establish fees based on the unique circumstances of each case.