If enacted, this bill would have a significant impact on the state's legislative authority and its relationship with other states. By rescinding these applications, South Carolina would distance itself from any initiatives that might seek to alter the U.S. Constitution through state calls for convention. This aligns with a broader movement among some state legislatures concerned about the potential implications of a constitutional convention, often viewed as unpredictable and risky due to the possibility of broad amendments being proposed.
Summary
House Bill 3395 aims to rescind any applications previously made by the South Carolina General Assembly to the United States Congress for the calling of a constitutional convention. This decision would effectively nullify any past attempts to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution, regardless of when those applications were made or the specific subjects they pertained to. The resolution would maintain that these applications are invalid and urges other states to similarly withdraw their applications to ensure consistency in legislative efforts across the nation.
Contention
A notable point of contention surrounding H3395 is the debate over the necessity and implications of a constitutional convention itself. Proponents of the bill argue that existing laws and the Constitution provide sufficient means for governance and any amendments should proceed through the traditional legislative route rather than a convention, which could open the door to significant changes. Conversely, opponents may view this as a restrictive move against efforts to amend the Constitution, which some believe is necessary to address current legal and social challenges.