South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

South Carolina House Bill H3729

Introduced
1/15/25  

Caption

Watercraft

Impact

If enacted, H3729 would require compliance from a significant number of watercraft owners in South Carolina, potentially leading to a rise in the number of insured operators. The bill would modify existing regulations concerning watercraft operation and ownership by explicitly mandating insurance coverage, thereby instituting a new layer of financial protection for individuals involved in boating accidents. The resulting fines collected from violations would be devoted to boater training and safety programs, promoting a culture of safe boating practices across the state.

Summary

House Bill 3729 seeks to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws by introducing a requirement for owners of watercraft that are at least sixteen feet in length to maintain liability insurance with a minimum coverage of fifty thousand dollars per occurrence. This bill aims to enhance safety on South Carolina waters by ensuring that operators of larger watercraft are financially responsible for potential damages or injuries caused while operating their vessels. The legislation defines terms related to insurance proof and outlines the consequences for non-compliance, including fines and misdemeanor charges.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding H3729 appears to be generally positive among proponents who advocate for increased safety and financial responsibility on the water. Supporters argue that mandating insurance for larger watercraft is a sensible step towards protecting both boat operators and other individuals on the water. However, there may be concerns regarding enforceability, the financial burden this could place on owners of larger boats, and varying opinions on whether such regulations are necessary given existing marine laws.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include debates about the financial implications for watercraft owners, particularly those who may not be accustomed to carrying insurance. Additionally, some stakeholders might argue about the practicality of enforcement and whether penalties are sufficient to encourage compliance among all boat operators. Overall, the bill addresses both the need for accountability in watercraft operation and the importance of ensuring community safety.

Companion Bills

SC S0026

Similar To Watercraft Liability Insurance

SC H3846

Similar To Marine Liability Insurance

Similar Bills

SC S0026

Watercraft Liability Insurance

SC H3858

Taxation on boats

SC S0061

Taxation on boats

MN HF949

Safety education required and water craft operators permitted, and motorboat rental business obligations imposed.

MN SF553

Safety education requirement and certain watercraft operators permission

MT HB165

Notaries not required for vehicle title transfer

MT HB670

Notaries not required for vehicle transfers

KY SB35

AN ACT relating to boater safety and making an appropriation.