World Health Organization prohibition
If enacted, HB 3859 will lead to a significant change in state policy regarding international organizations. It mandates that all state-funded entities terminate any current practices or policies associated with the WHO and requires them to conduct comprehensive reviews to eliminate any connections to the organization. This compliance will be documented in a report submitted to the General Assembly, ensuring oversight of these actions. The bill's supporters believe this will protect state sovereignty and align state-funded operations with the preferences of local constituents.
House Bill 3859 aims to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws by adding a provision that prohibits state-funded agencies, departments, universities, or public institutions from providing any form of support or funding to the World Health Organization (WHO). This legislation emerges in light of a directive from the President of the United States, withdrawing the U.S. from the WHO, citing concerns over its policies and practices. Proponents of the bill argue that it will uphold the principles of transparency and accountability in the allocation of taxpayer funds, ensuring these dollars do not support interests perceived as misaligned with those of South Carolinians.
The bill is likely to be a point of contention among lawmakers, with debates expected around the implications for public health initiatives that may have ties to the WHO. Opponents may argue that cutting ties with a leading global health organization could hinder South Carolina's ability to respond effectively to health issues and reduce access to vital health resources. Additionally, concerns regarding the potential loss of funding for health-related projects and initiatives derived from WHO guidelines may be raised, suggesting that the bill could have unintended consequences on public health in the state.