South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

South Carolina Senate Bill S0167

Introduced
1/14/25  
Refer
1/14/25  
Engrossed
2/6/25  

Caption

South Carolina Waterways Protection Act

Impact

The establishment of the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund is anticipated to impact related regulations in the state's laws concerning watercraft, local environmental management, and public safety. By providing a financial resource for addressing marine debris and hazards, the bill paves the way for systematic and organized removal efforts that may improve water quality and safety for recreational and commercial watercraft users. Additionally, the bill mandates that annual reports of fund expenditures be made public, ensuring transparency in how these funds are utilized.

Summary

S0167, known as the South Carolina Waterways Protection Act, aims to establish a dedicated funding mechanism for the management and protection of the state's waterways. It accomplishes this by creating the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund, which will be financed through a $3 fee collected with tax notices for watercraft. The bill outlines specific uses for the fund, including the removal of hazardous, abandoned, or unattended vessels and marine debris from state waters, thereby enhancing navigation safety and environmental health.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment toward S0167 appears to be positive, particularly among environmental advocacy groups and stakeholders in the recreational boating community who recognize the need for funding aimed at protecting waterways. The proponents of the bill underline its potential to enhance navigational safety and encourage responsible watercraft ownership. However, there may also be concerns from certain segments of the community regarding the additional fee imposed, which some may view as a burden that could deter watercraft ownership.

Contention

During discussions surrounding S0167, points of contention likely include the implementation of the waterways protection fee and its impacts on watercraft owners. Opponents could argue that any increase in fees could be burdensome for certain users, particularly in economically constrained communities. Moreover, there may be debates about the allocation of the fund's resources and whether they adequately address the most pressing environmental and navigational issues within the state's diverse waterways.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SC S0337

Blue Catfish

SC H3116

Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

NC H871

North Carolina Microplastics Study Act

NC H738

Restore Wetlands Protections

SC H3357

Shipping Transportation and Port Bridge Safety Study Committee

NC H597

Adopt Osprey as State Raptor

NC S555

Wetlands Protection and Restoration Act

NC S734

Clarifying Estuarine Waters AEC Under CAMA