South Carolina Senate Bill S0238

South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/25
• Refer: 1/16/25
• Engrossed: 2/5/25
• Refer: 2/19/25

Caption

Sine Die

Impact

The bill is likely to have significant implications for the legislative process in South Carolina. By formally extending the adjournment period, it ensures that budgeting and appropriations discussions remain a priority, minimizing the risks of government shutdowns or fiscal interruptions. The changes may foster a more structured approach to handling the annual appropriations act and enhance accountability. Additionally, by allowing for flexibility in session call-backs, it facilitates the completion of essential legislative business without being constrained by the predetermined end of sessions.

Summary

Bill S0238 proposes amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws, specifically Section 2-1-180, concerning the adjournment of the General Assembly and the conditions under which a session may be extended. It establishes that the sine die adjournment date is automatically extended if the House of Representatives does not pass the annual appropriations act by March 10. Moreover, it permits the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House to call their chambers back into session to resolve unfinished business related to the general appropriations bill or the Capital Reserve Fund resolution after the sine die adjournment date.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be positive among legislators who view it as a necessary enhancement for managing the legislative calendar effectively. Supporters argue that it provides essential continuity to government operations by ensuring that budgetary considerations are not unduly rushed or neglected. However, concerns may arise from critics who fear that extending sessions could lead to prolonged political maneuvering and diminish productivity, potentially complicating the legislative process further.

Contention

Some notable points of contention could arise from the perceived risk of extending sessions without adequate oversight, leading to concerns about legislative fatigue or extending negotiations beyond public scrutiny. Moreover, questions may surface regarding the implications of altering established procedural timelines and how this could affect the relationship between the legislative and executive branches, specifically regarding budgetary approvals. Ensuring transparency and maintaining a balance of power will be critical in the discussions that follow the introduction of this bill.