South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1013

Introduced
1/11/22  
Refer
1/14/22  
Refer
2/10/22  
Report Pass
2/16/22  
Engrossed
2/17/22  
Refer
2/22/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Enrolled
2/24/22  

Caption

Make an appropriation for certain costs related to Capitol Lake and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The passage of HB 1013 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws governing funding and environmental management. By designating funds explicitly for Capitol Lake and related infrastructure, the bill facilitates state intervention in the management and improvement of water resources, which is a critical concern for environmental sustainability. This appropriation also reflects a commitment to maintaining state properties and memorials, ensuring they remain accessible and well-maintained for public use.

Summary

House Bill 1013 is focused on the appropriation of funds for necessary projects related to Capitol Lake and the Veterans Memorials at Capitol Lake. Specifically, the bill allocates $500,000 from the general fund and $3,000,000 in federal fund expenditure authority to the Bureau of Administration. The funds are intended for developing a comprehensive Master Plan for Capitol Lake, plugging an existing well, and initiatives aimed at improving the water quality of the lake. The urgency of these actions is underscored by declaring an emergency, allowing the bill to take effect immediately upon passage and approval.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 1013 is likely to be positive, as it addresses pressing environmental issues and state infrastructure maintenance. The bipartisan nature of such appropriations can foster a favorable view among legislators and constituents who value environmental conservation and public access to state-owned properties. However, sentiments may vary among stakeholders who have specific views on environmental management and funding priorities.

Contention

Despite its positive reception, there may be points of contention related to how the funds will be utilized and monitored. Questions could arise regarding the effectiveness of the proposed Master Plan and the management of funds, as well as the implications for local environmental initiatives. Additionally, some may debate whether the $3,000,000 federal funding is justifiably allocated and if there are other pressing needs that should be prioritized within the state's budget.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.