South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1077

Introduced
1/18/22  
Refer
1/19/22  
Report Pass
2/3/22  
Engrossed
2/7/22  

Caption

Require certain language for the oath or affirmation for civil office.

Impact

The changes outlined in HB 1077 are focused on enhancing the uniformity and clarity of the oath-taking process for civil officeholders. By standardizing the language of the oath, the bill potentially increases accountability among public officials, ensuring that they openly commit to their obligations from the outset of their terms. This alteration is particularly relevant for newly elected members of the school board, as it directly impacts how they assume their roles and responsibilities.

Summary

House Bill 1077, introduced by Representative Mulally, aims to amend existing statutes concerning the language required for the oath or affirmation taken by individuals entering civil office in South Dakota. Specifically, it proposes that all elected or appointed officials must take an oath that closely matches the language specified in the South Dakota Constitution. This move is intended to reinforce the commitment of public officials to support both the U.S. Constitution and the state constitution, thereby emphasizing their responsibility to fulfill their duties faithfully.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1077 appears to be supportive, with consensus among legislators on the importance of clear and uniform oaths for civil officeholders. Supporters argue that the bill strengthens the ethical standards expected from public officials, thereby fostering greater trust in governmental operations. Given the nature of the bill and its straightforward purpose, significant opposition does not seem evident in the discussions.

Contention

Despite the general support for the bill, some concerns may arise regarding the implications of modifying the oath language, particularly in maintaining consistency with existing practices and interpretations of the constitution. Although not highlighted in the discussions, potential challenges could arise related to historical precedents or interpretations of the oath requirements. However, as it stands, the bill primarily seeks to clarify and reinforce, rather than radically alter, the process of assuming civil office.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.