South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1156

Introduced
1/26/22  
Refer
2/8/22  
Report Pass
2/22/22  
Engrossed
2/23/22  
Refer
2/23/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  
Enrolled
3/3/22  

Caption

Revise provisions regarding weed removal along highways.

Impact

The bill also introduces a voting mechanism whereby township voters can decide if the costs associated with cleanup should be the responsibility of landowners or funded by township resources. If costs fall to the landowners, they will be taxed correspondingly, while if the township bears the cost, it won't appear on the tax lists. This provision is designed to allow communities to exercise local control over the decision-making process regarding maintenance responsibilities and funding, potentially impacting the administrative practices within local governments.

Summary

House Bill 1156 aims to amend existing laws concerning the maintenance of highways by facilitating better weed removal processes along township roads. The bill stipulates that owners or occupants of land abutting township roads are charged with cutting, removing, or destroying grass, weeds, trees, and other unwanted plants within the road right-of-way to promote public safety and enhance the condition of the roads. The bill emphasizes the necessity of this maintenance during specified periods, suggesting a structured approach to weed control.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1156 appears largely supportive among legislators, as indicated by its unanimous passage without opposition (34 yeas, 0 nays). By streamlining the weed removal process and establishing clear responsibilities, proponents believe the bill will enhance local governance and public welfare, although specific concerns regarding individual landowner burdens and enforcement may emerge in community discussions.

Contention

Despite its support, there are underlying tensions related to the potential financial implications for landowners, who may feel an increased burden should costs be allocated to them via tax assessments. Moreover, the definition of the maintenance responsibilities and the timeline for required actions could lead to debates on practicality and fairness. Overall, while the bill is designed to improve the management of roadside growth and contribute to safer highways, the implementation of its provisions will require careful monitoring to balance local and individual interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB2752

PROP TX-APPOINTED TWP ASSESSOR

IN SB0182

Township mergers.

IL HB2830

PROP TX-TOWNSHIP ASSESSORS

IL HB2826

PROP TX-ASSESSORS

IN HB1355

Township merger pilot program.

IL SB2163

PROP TX-ASSESSORS

IL SB2504

TWP CD-CONSOLIDATION & MERGER

IL HB3842

TOWNSHIP CD-POLICE PROTECTION