Remove irreconcilable differences as a cause for divorce.
Votes
The bill has faced scrutiny in legislative discussions, evidenced by a vote on February 16, 2022, where it received 7 yeas and 6 nays, ultimately being deferred to the 41st legislative day. This narrow margin indicates a contentious reception among lawmakers, reflecting varying views on divorce law reform and the potential socio-economic implications of such changes.
Impact
The removal of 'irreconcilable differences' as a cause for divorce is expected to have a substantial impact on family law in South Dakota. Couples who previously opted for this ground now must pursue other causes requiring more proof of fault, which could prolong the legal process in cases where neither party is clearly at fault. By limiting the criteria for divorce, the bill may place an additional emotional and financial burden on individuals who wish to separate amicably.
Summary
House Bill 1199 introduces significant changes to the divorce laws in South Dakota by removing 'irreconcilable differences' as a ground for divorce. Previously, this classification was a significant legal basis allowing parties to dissolve their marriage without proving fault. The bill aims to streamline divorce proceedings by focusing on specific grounds such as adultery, extreme cruelty, and other established causes, potentially expediting the legal process for couples seeking separation.
Contention
Debate around HB1199 has likely surfaced due to the implications on personal freedom and the legal complexities of divorce proceedings. Critics may argue that the bill unnecessarily complicates cases where both parties agree on the dissolution and could lead to longer court cases. Proponents might advocate that removing 'irreconcilable differences' would encourage personal accountability and clarity within the legal framework while also respecting the sanctity of marriage.
In intestate succession, further providing for forfeiture; in elective share of surviving spouse, further providing for right of election and resident decedent; in wills, further providing for modification by circumstances; in estates, further providing for modification by divorce or pending divorce and for effect of divorce or pending divorce on designation of beneficiaries; in preliminary provisions, further providing for legislative findings and intent, for definitions and for premarital agreements; in dissolution of marital status, further providing for grounds for divorce, repealing provisions relating to counseling, further providing for grounds for annulment of voidable marriages, repealing provisions relating to defenses, to action where defendant suffering from mental disorder and to general appearance and collusion, providing for general order of divorce proceedings, repealing provisions relating to jury trial, further providing for decree of court and repealing provisions relating to limitations on attacks upon decrees and to opening or vacating decrees; in alimony and support, further providing for bar to alimony; and, in mediation, further providing for mediation programs.