South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB118

Introduced
1/26/22  
Refer
1/26/22  
Report Pass
2/7/22  
Engrossed
2/14/22  
Refer
2/15/22  
Report Pass
3/1/22  
Enrolled
3/2/22  

Caption

Establish provisions related to the testing of medical cannabis.

Impact

The implementation of SB118 is anticipated to have a significant impact on both state laws and the operations of medical cannabis providers. By enforcing testing requirements and standardizing processes for cannabis distribution, the bill aims to improve the safety of medical cannabis products, ultimately benefiting patient health. Additionally, the bill amends existing statutes to accommodate new testing protocols and application procedures for medical cannabis establishments, which could streamline operations while ensuring compliance. Registrants must now adhere to defined standards regarding everything from health safety to the accurate labeling of products, which will reshape how medical cannabis is handled statewide.

Summary

Senate Bill 118 establishes critical provisions related to the testing of medical cannabis in South Dakota. The bill requires that samples of cannabis and cannabis products meant for retail sale undergo rigorous testing procedures to ensure safety and compliance with health regulations. A key aspect outlined in the bill is the establishment of testing facilities that comply with established standards, as well as the requirement for proper registration and identification of cardholders and medical cannabis establishments. The intent of the bill is to ensure that products available to patients are safe, accurately labeled, and that they meet certain measurable standards, thus reinforcing public health protocols.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB118 appears largely supportive among those who prioritize patient safety and product integrity. Advocates for the bill express that these measures are necessary to protect patients and ensure that they have access to safe, properly evaluated products. However, there may also be concerns about the regulatory burden this bill places on dispensaries and the costs associated with compliance. Some industry insiders worry that stringent regulations could create barriers for smaller establishments that may struggle to meet the requirements outlined in the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding SB118 include the balance between regulation and access. While proponents argue that rigorous testing and safety standards are crucial to protect vulnerable patients, critics may express concerns over potential increased costs and access barriers for those needing medical cannabis. The bill's provision for suspending or terminating registration certifications based on violations also raises concerns about the degree of oversight and control the state will exert over medical cannabis establishments and how this will impact local businesses and patient access.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3785

Relating to authorizing the possession, use, cultivation, distribution, transportation, and delivery of cannabis for medical purposes; authorizing fees.

TX SB1839

Relating to authorizing the possession, use, cultivation, distribution, transportation, and delivery of cannabis for medical purposes; authorizing fees.

TN HB0172

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 4; Title 67 and Title 68, Chapter 7, relative to medical cannabis.

TN SB1461

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 4; Title 67 and Title 68, Chapter 7, relative to medical cannabis.

CA AB1428

Business practices: prepaid credit cards: refund methods.

MS HB976

Sellers of alternative nicotine products and package retailers; require to have a third-party age verification service.

SD SB24

Establish a maximum number of cannabis plants that may be cultivated by a medical cannabis cardholder.

SD HB1004

Prohibit cardholder cultivation of medical cannabis.