South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB201

Introduced
2/2/22  
Refer
2/2/22  
Report Pass
2/17/22  
Engrossed
2/23/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/1/22  
Enrolled
3/2/22  

Caption

Revise provisions regarding industrial hemp and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The legislation specifically addresses aspects such as transportation, documentation, and testing of industrial hemp, which are critical for ensuring compliance with THC concentration limits. Violations of these provisions can lead to serious legal consequences, highlighting the bill's attempt to promote responsible practices within the industry. The amendment of existing laws also emphasizes the importance of inspections, and the Department of Public Safety will be authorized to conduct inspections to monitor compliance, thereby significantly influencing how industrial hemp is cultivated and processed in South Dakota.

Summary

Senate Bill 201 is focused on revising and updating the regulatory framework surrounding industrial hemp in South Dakota. The bill aims to establish clearer guidelines for the licensing of growers, processors, and researchers involved in the hemp industry. It mandates compliance with federal statutes as well as setting application fees for various licenses while ensuring the state's regulations align with those outlined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The intent is to create a more streamlined process for legal industrial hemp production and to enhance the state's economic development linked to this emerging market.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB201 appears generally positive, particularly among proponents who view it as a step forward in legitimizing and regulating the hemp industry within the state. Supporters argue that the bill will aid in fostering an economic environment for hemp production that is both safe and compliant with state and federal laws. However, some dissent may arise from concerns regarding the stringent regulation and potential penalties that could affect smaller growers and processors, indicating a nuanced debate over balance between oversight and opportunity.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the strict penalties for non-compliance and the implications of transportation regulations that can complicate logistics for producers. While some stakeholders appreciate the emphasis on compliance and accountability, others caution that overly burdensome regulations could stifle growth in the fledgling industry. The bill's requirement for various licenses, along with a criminal background check for applicants, may also raise concerns about accessibility for potential new entrants into the market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SD SB117

Revise provisions regarding industrial hemp.

LA HB640

Provides relative to industrial hemp (EN INCREASE SG RV See Note)

KS HB2168

Substitute for HB 2168 by Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources - Amending the commercial industrial hemp act to reduce maximum license and registration fee amounts to $500.

LA HB758

Provides relative to industrial hemp

LA HB491

Provides for the regulation of industrial hemp (EN INCREASE SD EX See Note)

MS HB1676

Mississippi Intoxicating Hemp Regulation Act and Mississippi Medical Cannabis Act; revise certain provisions of.

AZ HB2406

Agriculture; hemp; regulation; vaccination; disclosure

LA HB843

To provide for the regulation of industrial hemp, industrial hemp products, and industrial hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) products (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)