Limit the provision of state assistance to federal authorities in certain matters related to firearms.
Impact
If enacted, SB209 would create a significant barrier for federal law enforcement agencies when dealing with investigations or prosecutions associated with firearms that conflict with South Dakota's firearms laws. This bill reflects state resistance to what are seen as federal encroachments on state sovereignty, particularly in the realm of gun rights. Supporters of SB209 argue that it emphasizes the state's autonomy to regulate firearms without federal interference and reinforces the protections granted under the Second Amendment.
Summary
Senate Bill 209, introduced by Senator Castleberry, aims to limit the provision of state assistance to federal authorities concerning matters related to firearms. The bill specifies that no state agency, political subdivision, or any official or employee thereof may provide assistance to a federal agency relating to the investigation, prosecution, or enforcement of federal statutes regarding firearms, ammunition, or related components if those federal regulations are more restrictive than state law. This legislation seeks to assert state rights concerning firearm regulations in the face of federal authority.
Contention
However, the bill has faced criticism and notable contention regarding its implications for public safety and law enforcement cooperation. Detractors, including some law enforcement groups and advocacy organizations, warn that by restricting cooperation with federal authorities on firearms-related matters, the legislation could hinder efforts to tackle gun violence and enforce laws that are crucial for community safety. Moreover, opponents argue that enforcing SB209 could lead to confusion and conflict between state and federal authorities, complicating legal proceedings and undermining the effectiveness of law enforcement.
Voting_history
On February 15, 2022, SB209 was tabled in the committee with a unanimous vote of 6-0. This vote reflects the initial legislative interest in the bill but also suggests ongoing debates and potential concerns around its broader implications, leading to its pause in further proceedings.
Relating to provisions governing the carrying of a firearm by a person who is not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law from possessing the firearm and to other provisions related to the carrying, possessing, transporting, or storing of a firearm.