South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB112

Introduced
1/25/23  
Refer
1/25/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Engrossed
2/21/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Report Pass
2/27/23  

Caption

Reduce certain gross receipts tax rates and a use tax rate, and to repeal a conditional reduction of certain gross receipts tax rates.

Impact

If enacted, SB112 would significantly impact state revenue, specifically affecting how businesses and individuals are taxed on their commercial activities. By lowering the gross receipts and use tax rates, the bill aims to alleviate financial burdens on small businesses and encourage growth and economic stability in the state by making it more attractive for both existing and new companies. This reduction in tax rates could also lead to increased consumer spending, as lower taxes often result in lower prices and improved affordability for goods and services.

Summary

Senate Bill 112 (SB112) focuses on amending various sections of the South Dakota tax code, specifically targeting the reduction of certain gross receipts tax rates and use tax rates. The bill proposes an adjustment to the current 4.5% tax rate on gross receipts by reducing it to 2.1% for businesses providing various services and tangible goods to consumers. Additionally, it intends to repeal a conditional reduction of gross receipts tax rates, thereby simplifying the tax structure for businesses operating within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB112 appears to be generally favorable among business groups and economic advocates who believe that reducing the tax burden will stimulate economic activity and job creation. However, some lawmakers and fiscal conservatives express concerns regarding the potential loss of state revenue that could arise as a result of these tax reductions. They argue that a careful balance must be struck to ensure that essential public services remain adequately funded in light of reduced tax income.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB112 highlights disagreements regarding fiscal policy and the long-term implications of tax cuts. Proponents argue that the bill supports small business growth and stimulates the economy, while critics worry about the ramifications for state funding and the necessity of services reliant on tax revenue. This contention reveals a broader conflict in tax policy discussions, where the balance between fostering economic growth and ensuring public welfare services is increasingly scrutinized.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD SB104

Reduce certain gross receipts tax rates and a use tax rate, and to repeal a conditional reduction of certain gross receipts tax rates.

SD HB1137

Reduce certain gross receipts tax rates and a use tax rate, and to repeal a conditional reduction of certain gross receipts tax rates.

SD HB1327

Reduce certain gross receipts tax rates and a use tax rate, and to repeal a conditional reduction of certain gross receipts tax rates.

SD HB1094

Lower the state sales tax rate and the state use tax rate on food to zero percent, and to repeal a conditional reduction of certain gross receipts tax rates.

SD SB164

Lower the state sales tax rate and the state use tax rate on food to zero percent, and to increase certain gross receipts tax rates, excise tax rates, and use tax rates.

SD HB1019

Eliminate certain property taxes levied on owner-occupied single-family dwellings, and to increase certain gross receipts tax rates and use tax rates.

SD SB121

Reduce maximum values for certain property taxes levied on owner-occupied single-family dwellings, and to increase the rates for certain gross receipts taxes and use taxes.

SD SJR510

To refer to the voters the question of whether this state should lower the state sales and use tax rate on food to zero percent, and to increase certain gross receipts tax rates, excise tax rates, and use tax rates.

SD HB1247

Reduce the gross receipts tax rate on retail sales and service and a certain use tax rate to four percent.

SD SB166

Reduce the rate of gross receipts tax on certain food.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1027

Critical telecommunications infrastructure; construction requirements

CO SB151

Telecommunications Security

CA AB2421

Land use: permitting: wireless communications: emergency standby generators.

CA SB649

Wireless telecommunications facilities.

CA AB1100

Communications service: disasters: reports.

FL S0344

Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991

AZ SB1208

Critical telecommunications infrastructure; construction requirements

NJ S4192

Removes requirement that local units may only provide broadband telecommunication service via wireless community service.