South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB68

Introduced
1/18/23  
Refer
1/18/23  
Report Pass
1/20/23  
Engrossed
1/23/23  
Refer
1/24/23  
Report Pass
1/30/23  

Caption

Modify the approval process for certain out-of-state travel and related costs by a legislative member.

Impact

If enacted, SB68 would allow the executive board to oversee and control the approval process for out-of-state travel more closely, thereby enhancing accountability in how legislative members incur and claim travel expenses. This change could help to ensure that state funds are managed more efficiently by requiring careful review before travel costs are reimbursed. Specifically, it modifies the rules surrounding funding after the second year of a member's term, which might deter last-minute travel requests by members who are not seeking reelection.

Summary

Senate Bill 68 seeks to modify the approval process for out-of-state travel and associated costs incurred by legislative members in South Dakota. The bill amends existing legislation, particularly ยง 2-9-4, to streamline how travel requests are processed and approved, placing specific responsibilities on the executive board and the Legislative Research Council regarding funding allocation and payment for travel expenses.

Conclusion

The proposed changes in SB68 reflect an effort to balance fiscal oversight with the operational needs of the state legislature. As the bill aims to tighten the screws on travel expense approvals, it is likely to provoke discussions about the importance of legislator accessibility to diverse resources and information that can be crucial for informed decision-making. The legislative community may need to weigh the benefits of controlling public spending against the potential drawbacks of restricted access to enriching out-of-state experiences.

Contention

Discussion surrounding SB68 has pointed out potential concerns about this legislative measure. Critics may argue that stricter controls on travel funding could hinder lawmakers' ability to engage in necessary out-of-state relationships that could benefit South Dakota. Moreover, while proponents of the bill advocate for fiscal responsibility, there may be concerns about excessive bureaucracy potentially stifling legislators' opportunities for training and networking through their travels.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.