South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1004

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  
Report Pass
1/12/24  
Engrossed
1/16/24  
Refer
1/17/24  
Report Pass
1/25/24  
Enrolled
1/29/24  

Caption

Update the official code of laws.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1004 is expected to have far-reaching implications for state laws, as it clarifies the hierarchy of statutes by asserting that if any new law contradicts or is inconsistent with this code, the new law takes precedence. This reinforces the structure of legal authority in the state, allowing for more straightforward navigation of regulations. It will eliminate confusion and potential litigation arising from inconsistencies in the law, thereby promoting legal clarity across various sectors affected by these statutes.

Summary

House Bill 1004 aims to update the official code of laws for the State of South Dakota by incorporating various legislative revisions and amendments. This bill serves the purpose of maintaining a current and comprehensive legal framework by integrating past revisions, making it easier for legislators, legal professionals, and the general public to access relevant laws. The update includes adjustments to previous volumes of the statute and establishes guidelines for referencing these laws in future legislative sessions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1004 appears largely positive, with most legislators recognizing the necessity of updating the code to reflect modern legal standards. The unanimous support in the voting process—31 yeas and 0 nays—indicates a bipartisan acknowledgment of the bill's importance. Stakeholders, including legal practitioners and government officials, have expressed satisfaction with the bill’s approach to streamlining state laws and ensuring their coherence.

Contention

While the bill received support from both sides of the aisle, discussions indicated that some legislators raised concerns about the rapid pace of legislative changes and the potential for future amendments to disrupt established legal precedents. Opponents, though few, suggested the need for more deliberation on particular amendments that could have long-term implications on local legislation and governance. However, these contentions did not significantly affect the overall support for the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.