Revise the process by which a legislative vacancy is filled.
Impact
The proposed bill potentially alters the current legislative procedures by establishing a time frame for both the submission of candidates by the central committees and the appointment by the Governor. This change is aimed at ensuring quicker representation for constituents when a legislative seat becomes vacant, as it compels the relevant political party to respond promptly. The implication of this mechanism could enhance accountability and reduce delays in governance resulting from vacancies.
Summary
House Bill 1188 aims to streamline and revise the process by which a legislative vacancy is filled in South Dakota. The bill mandates that when a vacancy arises in either house of the Legislature, the Governor must fill the vacancy from a list of three candidates submitted by the central committees of the former legislator's political party within ninety days. This lists encourages a structured approach where party representation is ensured in the legislature even in case of unexpected vacancies.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the bill's direction toward centralizing the selection process within political parties. Critics may argue that such a system could limit the involvement of a wider range of potential candidates and might overly prioritize party loyalty over public interest. Additionally, concerns might surface about the influence of party central committees in dictating the representatives of specific districts, which could spark debates around democracy and local political autonomy.
Proposing and submitting to the electors at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, updating references to certain officeholders and persons.
Establish the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States – South Dakota and revise provisions related to the foreign ownership or control of agricultural land.
Require the secretary of state to determine if a legislatively proposed constitutional amendment complies with the single subject requirement and is not a constitutional revision.