Revise the eligibility of roads for the rural access infrastructure fund.
Impact
This bill impacts state law by amending existing provisions that guide how rural infrastructure funds are allocated and used. It imposes a more structured approach for considering which projects are eligible for funding, emphasizing factors such as traffic use, public safety, and community benefit. The amendment may lead to more strategic investment in rural road improvements, benefiting the movement of goods and services while enhancing public safety on secondary highways. Moreover, it consolidates decision-making power with county commissioners regarding the fund allocation and project selection, which may streamline processes but also centralize authority at the county level.
Summary
Senate Bill 124 is an act aimed at revising the eligibility criteria for roads to receive funding from the rural access infrastructure fund in South Dakota. The bill requires counties to establish a fund where they can deposit moneys for various transportation-related projects. It specifies that the fund's use is limited to essential activities like engineering studies, construction, rehabilitation, and replacement of small structures situated on county secondary highways. Notably, it prohibits the use of funds on no maintenance roads, ensuring that the investments are directed toward roads that provide some level of service or access.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB124 appears to be generally supportive, as the legislation seeks to enhance rural infrastructure, which is crucial for economic development in less populated areas. Advocates for the bill argue that improved roads contribute significantly to local economies by facilitating better access for farmers, businesses, and residents. However, there might be some contention regarding the strict limitations on funding for certain types of roads, as multiple stakeholders might feel that the criteria could overlook some necessary projects that serve specific local needs.
Contention
Debate might arise around the decision-making process established by the bill, notably regarding how county officials determine eligibility and prioritize projects. Some representatives may express concern that the focus on traffic use and cost efficiency could inadvertently sideline critical infrastructure projects that do not meet these specific criteria but are nonetheless vital for local communities. Additionally, the nonappealability of county commissioner decisions could lead to frustration among constituents who may feel excluded from the decision-making process.
Allow townships to assess up to four dollars per front foot for a township paved road in a paved development and assess properties within three hundred feet of the paved road.