Providing legislative approval for a future use water permit application by the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System.
Impact
If approved, SJR502 will have significant implications for water management in Sioux and its surrounding counties. Approval of this permit would facilitate the availability of water resources for future use, potentially enhancing the ability to meet public water demands in the region. The Water Management Board has reviewed the application's impact and considers this appropriation beneficial to the public, indicating a reasonable probability that the unappropriated water is available and necessary for the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System's operations.
Summary
Senate Joint Resolution 502 (SJR502) provides legislative approval for the Lewis and Clark Regional Water System's application for a future use water permit. This application seeks to reserve a total of 19,121 acre-feet of unappropriated water annually from the Missouri: Elk Point Aquifer. The application process is mandated by South Dakota law, which requires any appropriation of this volume of water to receive legislative approval prior to any action by the Water Management Board.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SJR502 appears predominantly supportive within legislative discussions. The bipartisan approval, reflected in a 62-7 vote in favor of the bill, suggests broad recognition of the importance of ensuring adequate water supplies for future needs. While specific opposition points have not been detailed, any dissent may stem from concerns regarding the environmental impacts or the prioritization of water resources across competing uses.
Contention
Noteworthy points of contention surrounding SJR502 could relate to the stipulations attached to the permit. These include a requirement for review every seven years to determine the continued need for the permit, allowing for potential cancellation if the need is not substantiated. This provision aims to assure that water resources are managed with accountability and foresight; however, it also raises questions about the potential for disputes over water needs and usage among stakeholders in the region.