Update provisions on the interim legislative oversight of administrative rulemaking.
If enacted, HB1051 would significantly affect the processes surrounding administrative rulemaking in South Dakota. It requires agencies to provide advanced notice of public hearings on proposed rules, ensuring that stakeholders can prepare and participate in the legislative process. By focusing on small businesses, the bill aims to safeguard their interests and ensure that their operational capabilities are not unduly hampered by new regulations. Furthermore, the legislation encourages state agencies to consider less intrusive alternatives when drafting rules, promoting a more business-friendly environment.
House Bill 1051 seeks to update and enhance provisions governing the interim legislative oversight of administrative rulemaking in South Dakota. The bill is primarily focused on creating a more structured framework for state agencies when they propose new rules or amendments to existing ones. It emphasizes the need for agencies to prepare detailed impact statements when their proposed rules are likely to affect small businesses, thereby ensuring that businesses are informed about any new regulatory burdens they may face. The bill aims to improve transparency by mandating notification and public hearings regarding rulemaking activities.
The sentiment surrounding HB1051 appears to be mixed, with some stakeholders supporting the initiative for its potential to simplify and clarify the rulemaking process. Advocates argue that it balances the need for regulation with the realities of small business operations, thus fostering a collaborative environment between the state and the business community. However, there are concerns among some legislators and advocacy groups regarding the potential for bureaucratic delays introduced by the additional procedural requirements for rulemaking.
A notable point of contention regarding HB1051 is its insistence on detailed impact statements for rules affecting small businesses, which some critics believe could complicate rather than simplify the rulemaking process. Unlike current practices, the proposed law could introduce a layer of bureaucracy that some agencies view as unnecessary. Additionally, questions about the adequacy of public notification and the actual engagement of small businesses in the process remain prevalent in discussions around the bill.