South Dakota 2025 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB28

Introduced
1/14/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/18/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Refer
2/20/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/5/25  
Enrolled
3/6/25  

Caption

Revise provisions relating to licensing fees and license renewal dates for the practice of barbering and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The implementation of SB28 will affect both barbers and barbershop owners by slightly increasing the financial obligations required to maintain their licenses. The revisions specify that the annual renewal fee for a barber's certificate will remain at three hundred dollars, with similar fees set for operating permits and inspections. The bill's intent appears to be aligned with ensuring that barbering practices in the state are adequately regulated while also potentially raising necessary funds for the Board of Barber Examiners to conduct inspections and enforce regulations more effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 28 aims to revise existing provisions regarding the licensing fees and renewal dates required for practicing barbering in South Dakota. The bill sets specific fees for various licensing aspects, including the examination required to obtain a barber's certificate, annual renewal fees for both barbers and barbershops, and inspection costs. One significant aspect of the bill is that it includes a declaration of emergency, allowing the revised provisions to take effect immediately upon approval, reflecting the urgency of the legislative changes proposed.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB28 is largely neutral, with an understanding of the need for licensing in order to maintain professional standards within the barbering industry. However, there may be some contention regarding the financial implications of increased fees, particularly among smaller barbershop owners who may feel burdened by these costs. Nonetheless, proponents argue that such measures are necessary for the integrity of the profession and the safety of the public, emphasizing the importance of regulated standards in personal grooming services.

Contention

Notably, the bill could lead to debates regarding the affordability of operating a barbershop if the increased fees are perceived as excessive. This contention might stem from concerns over whether the cost of regulations is appropriate considering the diverse economic situations of barbers across the state. Additionally, some barbers might advocate for a tiered fee system to reflect different capacities for payment based on the size and revenue of their establishments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS HB781

Mobile barbershops; authorize licensed barbers to operate.

ND HB1314

Mobile barbershops and the associated fees, inspection rights, and penalties; and to provide a penalty.

TX HR1371

Recognizing April 7 through 13, 2013, as Barbershop Harmony Week.

MD HB1095

Montgomery County - Alcoholic Beverages - Beauty Salon and Barbershop License MC 3-25

VA HR569

Wathiq Alakelee; commending.

SC H3904

Kenneth Singleton

MD HB512

Frederick County - Barbershop and Beauty Salon Beer and Wine License - Alterations

MD SB738

Frederick County – Barbershop and Beauty Salon Beer and Wine License – Alterations