South Dakota 2025 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB79

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/22/25  
Report Pass
1/28/25  
Engrossed
1/29/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Enrolled
2/26/25  

Caption

Permit the operation of a Class I electric bicycle on the Mickelson Trail.

Impact

If enacted, SB79 would specifically amend section 41-17-27 of South Dakota state law, which currently prohibits motorized vehicles on the Mickelson Trail, with a few exceptions. The bill expands the definition of accepted vehicles on the trail to encompass Class I electric bicycles, which are defined as bicycles equipped with a motor that provides assistance while pedaling and ceases to provide assistance at a speed of 20 miles per hour. This change could lead to increased usage of the trail by electric bicycle users, potentially impacting pedestrian traffic and the overall dynamics of how the trail is utilized.

Summary

Senate Bill 79 aims to permit the operation of Class I electric bicycles on the Mickelson Trail in South Dakota. This legislation modifies existing prohibitions against motorized vehicles on the trail, which is primarily used for recreational purposes. By allowing Class I electric bicycles, the bill seeks to enhance transportation options for users of the trail while promoting eco-friendly commuting methods. The introduction of such bicycles aligns with broader trends toward sustainable transportation solutions and increasing access to outdoor recreational spaces for all citizens.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB79 seems generally positive among proponents of cycling and outdoor recreation. Supporters argue that permitting electric bicycles on the trail will encourage more individuals to engage in cycling activities and make the trail more accessible to a broader range of users, including those who may have physical limitations that make traditional cycling challenging. However, there may be concerns from traditional cyclists and pedestrians about the safety and impact of electric bicycles on trail usage, highlighting a need for further discussion and potential regulations regarding speed limits and rider etiquette.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from differing opinions on the implications of allowing electric bicycles on the trail. While proponents view it as an advancement in recreational mobility, detractors may worry about the potential for increased accidents or conflicts between electric bicycle users and pedestrians. Additionally, the definition of what constitutes a Class I electric bicycle could lead to debates over enforcement and compliance, thereby necessitating clear guidelines to ensure the safety and enjoyment of all trail users.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD SB56

Permit the operation of a Class I electric bicycle on the Mickelson Trail.

SD SB92

Require that certain operations obtain their own general or individual water pollution permits.

SD HB1215

Revise certain provisions regarding the operation of a golf cart on a state or county highway.

SD SB81

Expand permission on installing electric wiring in a residence.

SD HB1095

Establish provisions for the operation of automated motor vehicles.

SD HB1225

Define a multi-passenger quadricycle and to provide for the regulation of multi-passenger quadricycles.

SD HB1034

Require hydrogen pipelines to be permitted by the Public Utilities Commission.

SD SB59

Provide for the downgrade of commercial driver licenses and commercial learners permits upon notice of certain drug and alcohol violations.

SD HB1182

Revise provisions pertaining to the observation of the conduct of an election.

SD HB1107

Prohibit the use of certain mobile electronic devices while driving, and to provide a penalty therefor.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.