AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47; Title 49; Title 66 and Title 68, relative to building safety.
The bill will significantly affect Tennessee Code Annotated, particularly titles 47, 49, 66, and 68, by introducing new requirements for fuel gas detectors in residential properties. By requiring landlords to maintain these detectors in working condition and ensuring their installation across new or renovated properties, the legislation promotes a higher standard of safety. Moreover, the law outlines civil penalties for non-compliance, which are structured based on the number of offenses, reinforcing accountability among property owners.
House Bill 171, also known as the Fuel Gas Detector Act, seeks to enhance safety measures in residential buildings by mandating the installation of fuel gas detectors. Specifically, the bill requires building owners to install at least one fuel gas detector in every room that contains appliances fueled by propane, natural gas, or liquefied petroleum gas in multi-family occupancy buildings and single-family rental properties built or renovated after July 1, 2023. The law aims to mitigate risks associated with gas leaks and enhance the safety of tenants and building occupants.
The sentiment around HB 171 appears largely supportive among health and safety advocates, who recognize the importance of preventing incidents related to gas leaks. However, some landlords may express concerns about the additional financial burden imposed by the new requirements, which could be viewed as a challenge to the cost-effectiveness of property management. Overall, the discourse reflects a balance between enhancing tenant safety and managing the implications for property owners.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 171 include the enforcement of penalties and the responsibilities placed on property owners. Critics of the bill may argue that it imposes excessive financial penalties for violations, with fines potentially reaching thousands of dollars for repeated offenses in multi-family dwellings. Supporters, on the other hand, argue that the benefits of improved safety standards will outweigh these costs, particularly in light of the risks posed by gas leaks. Debates may arise regarding the feasibility of compliance for small landlords versus larger property management firms.