Tennessee House Bill HB1006

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Refer: 3/1/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, Chapter 33, relative to forfeiture.

Impact

The amendment is significant in that it updates the legal framework governing how forfeitures are conducted in Tennessee. By modifying the relevant sections of the code, HB1006 is designed to enhance the speed and efficiency of the forfeiture process, allowing for more expeditious resolution of seizures that occur in relation to law enforcement activities. It is anticipated that this change will facilitate quicker returns of property to law enforcement and potentially impact how cases of seized assets are handled in the state's judicial system.

Summary

House Bill 1006 seeks to amend provisions within the Tennessee Code Annotated relating to the process of forfeiture. The essential change involves removing specific provisions that dictate parts of the forfeiture procedure. Specifically, the bill deletes the language regarding 'cost bond or' in the relevant statutes. This amendment aims to streamline the forfeiture process for law enforcement agencies by eliminating certain procedural requirements, thus enabling more efficient management of seized property.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB1006 appears to lean towards supporting law enforcement's need for streamlined processes. Proponents may argue that the amended procedure will reduce delays and enhance operational efficiency for police agencies tasked with managing forfeited assets. However, there may also be concerns raised by advocates for civil liberties and property rights, who worry that such amendments could infringe upon individuals' rights regarding their property and may lead to an increase in abuses related to asset seizure.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB1006 involve the balance between effective law enforcement and the rights of citizens. Critics of stricter forfeiture laws often express that such measures could lead to potential overreach by the police in seizing property without adequate checks and balances. As such, while the bill aims to improve procedural efficiency, it raises questions about how these changes may affect the fundamental rights of individuals in Tennessee regarding due process and property ownership.