Tennessee House Bill HB1148

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 9; Title 11; Title 29; Title 43; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69 and Title 70, relative to outdoor recreation.

Impact

If enacted, HB1148 will significantly affect how outdoor recreation initiatives are managed and communicated within the state. By requiring the publication of related documents online, the bill aims to foster a more informed public and enable stakeholders to be more actively engaged in the policy-making process. This change is anticipated to support collaborative efforts between the government and local communities, particularly in enhancing recreational opportunities and ensuring the sustainable management of outdoor spaces.

Summary

House Bill 1148 seeks to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, particularly addressing matters related to outdoor recreation. The bill is designed to enhance transparency within the department by mandating the electronic publication of proposals and reports submitted by the commissioner to both the governor and the general assembly. This initiative underscores a commitment to improved public access to information and aims to engage the community more fully in discussions regarding outdoor recreation policies.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB1148 appears to be supportive of the goal to improve transparency and public involvement. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step towards accountability in government operations, especially in areas tied to environmental stewardship and recreation. However, there may be concerns regarding the resources available for the implementation of electronic communications and whether this aligns with existing budgetary constraints.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the practicality of implementing these requirements and the implications for departmental operations. Some legislators could argue that numerous amendments to the code complicate existing laws, potentially leading to confusion regarding regulatory responsibilities. Therefore, while the aspirations of HB1148 are largely favored, the execution and integration into current processes might raise debates about efficiency and resource allocation.