Tennessee House Bill HB1170

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 1/23/24
• Refer: 1/31/24
• Engrossed: 2/8/24
• Enrolled: 2/23/24
• Passed: 3/7/24
• Chaptered: 3/15/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 38; Title 41 and Title 68, relative to medical care.

Impact

The proposed amendments in HB 1170 are anticipated to have significant implications for healthcare providers, patients, and the regulatory landscape in Tennessee. By modifying existing statutes, the bill could lead to improved medical care delivery as well as adjustments in the regulatory requirements for healthcare entities. This legislative change may particularly influence how medical care services are administered across various jurisdictions, thereby fostering a more cohesive approach to healthcare in the state.

Summary

House Bill 1170 seeks to amend provisions within the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically focusing on Title 38, Title 41, and Title 68, which relate to medical care. The essence of the bill revolves around enhancing the framework for medical care regulations in Tennessee, aiming to streamline and possibly expand access to necessary medical services. Its proponents argue that such amendments are essential for addressing current gaps in service delivery and ensuring that all citizens have better access to medical care.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 1170 appear to be largely favorable, especially among healthcare advocates and some legislative members who express strong support for enhancing medical care access. However, there is also a cautious sentiment among certain factions wary of potential overreach or unintended consequences that could arise from altering established laws. The prevailing tone indicates a recognition of the need for reform while simultaneously stressing the importance of careful consideration of the impacts that such changes might incur.

Contention

Key points of contention focus on the specifics of the amendments proposed and how they might affect current medical practices and patient rights. Critics are particularly concerned about the potential for unintended negative consequences stemming from the new regulations. Moreover, there is apprehension regarding the adequacy of oversight and the responsibility of healthcare providers to ensure compliance with the newly established requirements. These discussions reflect a broader theme prevalent in healthcare legislation, balancing the need for reform with safeguarding patients' interests and rights.