AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, Chapter 4, Part 6; Title 10, Chapter 7, Part 5 and Title 55, Chapter 50, Part 2, relative to public records.
The impact of HB 1322 on state laws is significant. It introduces a structured approach to managing the distribution of public records and strengthens oversight regarding who accesses sensitive information. The bill necessitates that the names and contact information of those making recurrent bulk purchases are made available online, along with the amount of information they have requested over the past year. This requirement is intended to prevent misuse of personal data and ensure that the public remains informed about who is collecting this type of information.
House Bill 1322 is designed to amend several sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to enhance the state's system for tracking bulk purchases of public records, specifically those related to motor vehicle records. This legislation mandates the Office of Open Records Counsel to collaborate with the Departments of Safety and Revenue to establish a comprehensive tracking system for individuals or entities purchasing public records in bulk. By implementing this system, the bill aims to increase transparency and hold accountable those who repeatedly request personal information from state records.
The sentiment surrounding HB 1322 appears to be generally supportive among advocates of transparency in government records. However, there may be concerns about privacy and the implications of increased scrutiny on bulk purchasers. Supporters argue that such measures are crucial for protecting citizens' personal information and enhancing public trust in the handling of state records. Critics, although not prominently mentioned, may consider the bill's implications for the accessibility of public records for legitimate research or business purposes.
Notable points of contention regarding HB 1322 revolve around the balance between transparency and privacy. While the measures aim to promote accountability for bulk purchases, there is potential concern about how this information will be used and whether it might deter legitimate businesses from accessing necessary public records. Additionally, the implications for state agencies tasked with managing these records and the potential administrative burden of complying with the new tracking requirements may also raise questions and debate.