Tennessee House Bill HB1589

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Refer: 1/10/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 54; Title 39, Chapter 17 and Title 40, relative to ammunition magazines for firearms.

Impact

The impact of HB1589 on state laws centers around stricter regulations concerning firearms and ammunition components. By instituting penalties for violations, it seeks to deter the manufacture and distribution of high-capacity magazines, which proponents believe will enhance public safety. This bill aligns with ongoing discussions about gun control in Tennessee and may set a precedent for future legislation regarding firearm accessories. The provision allowing individuals to retain magazines obtained prior to the enforcement date reflects an attempt to balance regulation with existing rights.

Summary

House Bill 1589 aims to amend the Tennessee Code to regulate the manufacture, transfer, and purchase of detachable firearms ammunition magazines that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition. Specifically, the bill introduces a new section to Title 39, Chapter 17 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, establishing a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for violations. Additionally, any ammunition magazines that are unlawfully manufactured, transferred, or purchased would be subject to forfeiture under the law. The law is set to take effect on July 1, 2023, prioritizing public welfare in its introduction.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB1589 is likely mixed, reflecting the polarized views on gun control in Tennessee. Supporters of the bill argue that limiting magazine capacities could reduce gun violence and enhance safety in public spaces. On the contrary, opponents may view it as an unnecessary restriction on Second Amendment rights, fearing it could lead to further regulations that infringe on personal freedoms. The debate is indicative of broader national conversations surrounding gun ownership and regulation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB1589 include its potential impact on legal gun owners and the perception of overreach by lawmakers. Critics may argue that the bill's focus on ammunition magazines does not address the deeper issues of gun violence and might not effectively prevent crimes. Conversely, advocates for gun control might argue that the measure is a necessary first step towards more comprehensive firearm legislation. The upcoming enforcement date also raises questions about the transition period for compliance and potential legal challenges from gun rights advocates.