Tennessee House Bill HB1674

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/30/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 11, Chapter 4, Part 3 and Section 11-4-409, relative to the management of state forests.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB1674 are expected to modernize forest management strategies and establish a more structured approach to overseeing state forests. This includes not only the introduction of fees for the use of forest resources but also civil penalties for violations that could harm these areas. The enforcement mechanisms outlined in the bill will empower the commissioner to take necessary action against any illegal activities, such as vandalism or the destruction of threatened plant species, thus reinforcing legal protections for state forests.

Summary

House Bill 1674 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding the management of state forests. The bill focuses on enhancing the authority of the commissioner responsible for the oversight and management of these forests and introduces provisions for entering into agreements with third parties for conservation, maintenance, and recreational programs. By doing so, it intends to promote and improve the utilization of state forest resources, thereby fostering both environmental conservation and recreational opportunities for the public.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1674 appears to be largely supportive among those who advocate for enhanced conservation efforts and the promotion of recreational use of state forests. Proponents believe that the bill will improve forest management and ensure that state resources are utilized effectively while also protecting biodiversity. Conversely, there may be some skepticism regarding the imposition of fees and civil penalties, as well as concerns about the potential for increased regulation impacting access to these natural areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the introduction of fees for forest use and the strict enforcement measures proposed. While supporters argue that such fees are justified to maintain and protect state forests, opponents might argue that they could limit public access or disproportionately affect individuals seeking to utilize these forests for recreation. The balance between promoting conservation and ensuring public accessibility will be a critical discussion point as the bill is debated in the legislature.