Tennessee House Bill HB1693

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/14/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Chaptered: 3/19/24
• Passed: 3/19/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 44, relative to the Tennessee Commission for the United States Semiquicentennial Commission Act.

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB 1693 have the potential to streamline the operation of the Commission, making it easier for relevant stakeholders to contribute to the discussions and initiatives surrounding the commemorative activities planned for the Semiquicentennial, which marks the 250th anniversary of important historical events in U.S. history. By allowing designees to serve, the bill facilitates increased involvement from various agencies and organizations, thereby enhancing representation and inclusivity in planning significant commemorative events.

Summary

House Bill 1693 proposes amendments to existing legislation regarding the Tennessee Commission for the United States Semiquicentennial Commission Act. This initiative aims to alter the composition of the commission by changing how members are defined and who can serve. Specifically, the bill updates the phrasing regarding the commission's members to allow ex officio voting members or their respective designees to be included as part of the commission, thereby broadening the eligibility for participation in the commission's activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment among legislators appears to be largely supportive of the bill, as evidenced by the unanimous consent passage during the voting process. Lawmakers recognize the importance of engaging a broader range of participants in the Commission's efforts relating to the Semiquincentennial, and by modernizing the membership criteria, the bill fosters collaboration across different sectors involved in historical, cultural, and educational initiatives.

Contention

While the bill received broad support, there may still be underlying concerns about how the changes could affect the balance of power within the commission and whether the inclusion of designees might dilute accountability. Stakeholders might voice apprehensions about ensuring that those who represent various interests are genuinely engaged and that the integrity of the commission's goals is maintained. Overall, the changes reflect a legislative trend toward enhancing government responsiveness and adaptability in recognizing historical significance.