Tennessee House Bill HB1743

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/29/24
• Chaptered: 3/19/24
• Passed: 3/19/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 63, Chapter 19, relative to the board of physician assistants.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 1743 are expected to revise the regulatory landscape for healthcare professionals within the state, particularly focusing on the operational scope of physician assistants. By amending existing statutes, the bill could lead to enhanced efficiency in how the board operates, potentially improving healthcare access and quality for residents seeking medical care. Moreover, the bill's passage suggests a legislative intent to adapt to the evolving dynamics of healthcare practices, ensuring that regulatory mechanisms align more closely with contemporary medical practices and workforce needs.

Summary

House Bill 1743 proposes amendments to the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning the board of physician assistants. The bill aims to streamline the regulatory framework governing physician assistants in Tennessee by modifying specific sections within Titles 4 and 63. These amendments are designed to enhance the functions of the board and update its statutory authority, clarifying the board's composition, responsibilities, and operational procedures. As such, the bill seeks to foster a more efficient regulatory environment for physician assistants, ultimately impacting healthcare delivery in the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 1743 appears to be supportive, with a consensus among legislators recognizing the importance of optimizing the board of physician assistants. The bill was passed unanimously in a recent vote, reflecting bipartisan agreement on the need for regulatory efficiency in healthcare. While specific public commentary on the bill is limited, the absence of opposition during voting indicates a largely favorable reception among stakeholders, including healthcare providers who may benefit from the proposed reforms.

Contention

Despite the overall positive reception, discussions surrounding HB 1743 have not been without contention. Some stakeholders have raised concerns regarding the possible implications of the amendments on the autonomy and authority of the board. Critics argue that while regulatory streamlining is beneficial, it is vital to ensure that changes do not compromise the quality of oversight provided by the board of physician assistants. The balance between efficient regulation and maintaining rigorous standards is a point of discussion that could invoke varying opinions among healthcare practitioners and regulatory experts.